Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ubuntu vs Windows Server : What are the differences?
# Introduction
1. **Hardware Support**: Ubuntu is known for its wide range of hardware compatibility, while Windows Server requires specific drivers and hardware support.
2. **Cost**: Ubuntu is open-source and free to download and use, whereas Windows Server requires a license fee which can be costly for enterprise use.
3. **User Interface**: Ubuntu typically offers a more lightweight and customizable user interface compared to the standard Windows Server GUI, which may appeal to users who prefer a simpler interface.
4. **Software Ecosystem**: Ubuntu is known for its vast library of open-source software and tools, while Windows Server offers a wide range of proprietary software and applications that may be more tailored for enterprise needs.
5. **Security**: Ubuntu is often seen as more secure due to its open-source nature, frequent updates, and robust community support, while Windows Server may require additional security measures due to its popularity as a target for cyber attacks.
6. **Resource Usage**: Ubuntu is generally more efficient in terms of resource usage compared to Windows Server, making it a preferable choice for systems with limited resources or for virtual machines.
In Summary, Ubuntu and Windows Server differ in terms of hardware support, cost, user interface, software ecosystem, security, and resource usage.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Pros of Windows Server
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1
Cons of Windows Server
- License needed1
- Not open source1