Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
VirtualBox vs libvirt: What are the differences?
Introduction to VirtualBox and libvirt
VirtualBox and libvirt are both popular open-source virtualization technologies used in the IT industry. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that make them suitable for different use cases. In this article, we will explore the main differences between VirtualBox and libvirt.
Architecture and Hypervisors: VirtualBox is a Type-2 hypervisor that installs on top of an existing operating system, while libvirt is a framework that works with multiple hypervisors, including Type-1 hypervisors like KVM and Xen. This means that VirtualBox provides virtualization by running on top of an operating system, while libvirt works directly with the hardware for better performance.
Operating System Support: VirtualBox is known for its wide range of operating system support, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Solaris. On the other hand, libvirt primarily focuses on Linux-based operating systems, as it is built on top of the Linux Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) technology.
Management Interface: VirtualBox provides a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to manage virtual machines easily. It also offers a command-line interface (CLI) for advanced users. In contrast, libvirt focuses on providing a command-line interface (CLI) and APIs, making it more suitable for automation and integration with other tools.
Virtualization Features: VirtualBox offers a wide range of virtualization features, including support for hardware virtualization, snapshotting, remote desktop access, and USB device sharing. Libvirt, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a stable and reliable virtualization platform, with features such as live migration, security labeling, and support for multiple hypervisors.
Community and Support: VirtualBox has a large and active community, with frequent updates and a wealth of online resources and tutorials available. It is backed by Oracle, which provides commercial support for VirtualBox. Libvirt also has a thriving community and is supported by Red Hat, which provides commercial support for libvirt.
Integration and Ecosystem: Libvirt is designed to be a flexible and extensible framework, allowing users to integrate it with other management tools and automation frameworks easily. It also supports various virtualization technologies and management interfaces through its plugin architecture. VirtualBox, on the other hand, is a standalone virtualization solution and does not provide the same level of integration and extensibility as libvirt.
In summary, VirtualBox is a user-friendly standalone virtualization solution with extensive operating system support, while libvirt is a versatile framework designed for Linux-based operating systems, providing better performance and integration options. Both technologies have their strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different virtualization use cases.
Pros of libvirt
- Low overhead2
- Free2
- Built into most Linux distros2
- Fast2
- Native KVM and QEMU2
- Native hypervisor2
- Can fully manage via CLI or VirtManager2
- VirtIO direct hardware access2
- VirtIO direct hardware support1
Pros of VirtualBox
- Free358
- Easy231
- Default for vagrant169
- Fast110
- Starts quickly73
- Open-source45
- Running in background42
- Simple, yet comprehensive41
- Default for boot2docker27
- Extensive customization22
- Free to use3
- Mouse integration2
- Easy tool2
- Cross-platform2