Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Qt5

94
136
+ 1
12
wxWidgets

22
75
+ 1
19
Add tool

Qt5 vs wxWidgets: What are the differences?

  1. Toolset and Language Compatibility: One key difference between Qt5 and wxWidgets is the toolset and language compatibility. Qt5 is primarily compatible with C++ and provides its own set of tools for developing applications. On the other hand, wxWidgets supports multiple programming languages such as C++, Python, and Perl, allowing developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with.

  2. Platform Support: Qt5 and wxWidgets also differ in terms of platform support. Qt5 is known for its extensive cross-platform support and allows developers to build applications for Windows, macOS, Linux, and various embedded systems. In contrast, wxWidgets provides support for a wide range of platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, Unix, and even some mobile platforms such as Android and iOS.

  3. GUI Design: Another significant difference lies in the GUI design approach. Qt5 follows a declarative approach to UI design using its own markup language called QML. This allows for more flexibility in designing graphical interfaces and creating visually appealing applications. On the other hand, wxWidgets follows a more traditional procedural approach where GUI components are created programmatically using the wxWidgets API.

  4. License: Qt5 and wxWidgets have different licensing models. Qt5 is available under both commercial and open-source licenses, allowing developers to choose between a free open-source version or a commercial license for commercial use. On the other hand, wxWidgets is released under a modified version of the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) which allows for free distribution of applications.

  5. Community and Documentation: Qt5 and wxWidgets also differ in terms of community support and documentation. Qt5 has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available, making it easier for developers to find support and learn the framework. While wxWidgets also has a supportive community, it may not be as large as Qt's community, resulting in a relatively smaller pool of resources and support available.

  6. Ecosystem and Third-Party Libraries: Lastly, the ecosystems surrounding Qt5 and wxWidgets differ in terms of available third-party libraries and tools. Qt has a well-established ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, tools, and plugins, offering additional functionality and features to developers. In comparison, while wxWidgets also has a decent collection of third-party libraries, it may not be as extensive as Qt's ecosystem.

In Summary, Qt5 and wxWidgets differ in terms of toolset and language compatibility, platform support, GUI design approach, licensing, community support, and ecosystem of third-party libraries.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Qt5
Pros of wxWidgets
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    C++
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Fast enough
  • 5
    Native looking UI
  • 4
    Learning Curve
  • 3
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Permissive license. Commercial with static linkage.
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Pure C++ code
  • 1
    Python
  • 1
    Performance

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Qt5
Cons of wxWidgets
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Uses Qt for GUI (wxQt)

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Qt5?

    It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

    What is wxWidgets?

    It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Qt5?
    What companies use wxWidgets?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Qt5?
    What tools integrate with wxWidgets?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Qt5 and wxWidgets?
    Electron
    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.
    Kivy
    It is an open source Python library for rapid development of applications that make use of innovative user interfaces, such as multi-touch apps. It runs on Linux, Windows, OS X, Android, iOS, and Raspberry Pi. You can run the same code on all supported platforms.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Python
    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    See all alternatives