StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. XMPP vs ZeroMQ

XMPP vs ZeroMQ

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ZeroMQ
ZeroMQ
Stacks258
Followers586
Votes71
GitHub Stars10.6K
Forks2.5K
XMPP
XMPP
Stacks71
Followers138
Votes0

XMPP vs ZeroMQ: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will be discussing the key differences between XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) and ZeroMQ.

  1. Messaging Pattern: XMPP is a messaging protocol that follows a client-server architecture, where clients connect to a central server for communication. On the other hand, ZeroMQ is a messaging library that supports various messaging patterns, such as publish-subscribe, request-reply, and push-pull, allowing for more flexible communication.

  2. Reliability: XMPP provides built-in features for reliable message delivery, including message acknowledgement and error handling mechanisms. ZeroMQ, on the other hand, leaves the responsibility of message reliability to the developers, allowing for more control over the trade-off between performance and reliability.

  3. Scalability: XMPP is suitable for small to medium-scale applications due to its client-server architecture, which can limit scalability. ZeroMQ, with its support for distributed messaging patterns like publish-subscribe and brokerless communication, is more scalable and can handle large volumes of messages efficiently.

  4. Extensibility: XMPP is designed to be extensible, allowing for the addition of custom features and functionalities through extensions. ZeroMQ, while offering a wide range of messaging patterns, is less extensible in terms of adding new functionalities beyond what the library provides.

  5. Protocol Complexity: XMPP is a structured protocol with defined standards and specifications, which can make it more complex to implement and maintain compared to ZeroMQ, which is a lightweight messaging library with a simpler API and fewer protocol layers.

  6. Use Cases: XMPP is commonly used in instant messaging and real-time communication applications, where the emphasis is on presence information and message exchange. ZeroMQ, on the other hand, is more suited for distributed systems, message queuing, and high-performance computing applications that require efficient inter-process communication.

In Summary, XMPP and ZeroMQ differ in their messaging pattern, reliability, scalability, extensibility, protocol complexity, and use cases, making them suitable for different types of applications based on specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ZeroMQ
ZeroMQ
XMPP
XMPP

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Connect your code in any language, on any platform.;Carries messages across inproc, IPC, TCP, TPIC, multicast.;Smart patterns like pub-sub, push-pull, and router-dealer.;High-speed asynchronous I/O engines, in a tiny library.;Backed by a large and active open source community.;Supports every modern language and platform.;Build any architecture: centralized, distributed, small, or large.;Free software with full commercial support.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
258
Stacks
71
Followers
586
Followers
138
Votes
71
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Fast
  • 20
    Lightweight
  • 11
    Transport agnostic
  • 7
    No broker required
  • 4
    Low level APIs are in C
Cons
  • 5
    No message durability
  • 3
    Not a very reliable system - message delivery wise
  • 1
    M x N problem with M producers and N consumers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to ZeroMQ, XMPP?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase