StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Structr vs Webiny Headless CMS

Structr vs Webiny Headless CMS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Structr
Structr
Stacks3
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars807
Forks157
Webiny Headless CMS
Webiny Headless CMS
Stacks11
Followers39
Votes19
GitHub Stars7.9K
Forks660

Structr vs Webiny Headless CMS: What are the differences?

  1. Integration Capabilities: Structr focuses on providing seamless integration with existing systems and offers connectors for various databases and platforms. In contrast, Webiny Headless CMS emphasizes integration with serverless infrastructure, allowing for easy deployment and scalability in cloud environments.

  2. Customization Options: Structr offers a highly customizable schema editor, enabling users to define complex data models and relationships. On the other hand, Webiny Headless CMS provides a visual editor for creating and managing content models, offering flexibility through drag-and-drop functionality.

  3. Community Support: Structr has a smaller community compared to Webiny Headless CMS, which benefits from a larger user base contributing plugins, extensions, and resources. This difference in community size can impact the availability of resources and support for users of both platforms.

  4. Deployment Flexibility: Structr offers more traditional deployment options, including on-premises and private cloud hosting. In contrast, Webiny Headless CMS is designed for serverless architectures, enabling easy deployment on cloud providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.

  5. User Interface Design: Structr focuses on providing a straightforward and functional user interface for data modeling and management tasks. In contrast, Webiny Headless CMS prioritizes a user-friendly and intuitive design, catering to users with varying levels of technical expertise in content creation and management.

  6. Security Features: Structr emphasizes robust security features such as role-based access control, data encryption, and audit trails for compliance requirements. Conversely, Webiny Headless CMS places a strong emphasis on securing serverless infrastructure, providing built-in security measures to protect against common threats in cloud environments.

In Summary, Structr and Webiny Headless CMS offer distinct advantages in integration capabilities, customization options, community support, deployment flexibility, user interface design, and security features for users seeking a headless CMS solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Structr
Structr
Webiny Headless CMS
Webiny Headless CMS

Structr (pronounce it like 'structure') is a Java framework for mobile and web applications based on the graph database Neo4j. It was designed to simplify the creation of complex graph database applications by providing a comprehensive Java API and a set of features common to most use cases. This enables developers to build a sophisticated web or mobile app based on Neo4j within hours.

A big chunk of your server resources aren't utilized. With Webiny adopt serverless and save 60-80% on your cloud hosting bill and on infrastructure operations costs. Forget worrying about flash crowds and uptime.

Security and Access Control;Data modeling without programming;Graph-based Page Rendering Engine;Built-in file and image server;Integrated REST Server;Advanced indexing and -search
Powerful content modelling UI; GraphQL API; Multi-language support; 100% Javascript; Microservices architecture; Support for multiple environments and aliases
Statistics
GitHub Stars
807
GitHub Stars
7.9K
GitHub Forks
157
GitHub Forks
660
Stacks
3
Stacks
11
Followers
22
Followers
39
Votes
0
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    Serverless
  • 3
    Rapid Development
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Headless
Integrations
Neo4j
Neo4j
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
GraphQL
GraphQL
Swift
Swift
Next.js
Next.js
Gatsby
Gatsby

What are some alternatives to Structr, Webiny Headless CMS?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack