StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Swoole vs Symfony

Swoole vs Symfony

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Symfony
Symfony
Stacks8.5K
Followers6.2K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars30.7K
Forks9.7K
Swoole
Swoole
Stacks57
Followers134
Votes27
GitHub Stars18.8K
Forks3.2K

Swoole vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Introduction

Swoole and Symfony are both popular PHP frameworks used for web development. However, there are key differences between the two frameworks that set them apart. In this analysis, we will explore and compare these differences to gain a better understanding of when to choose Swoole over Symfony or vice versa.

  1. Development Paradigm: Swoole is an event-driven and asynchronous programming framework, whereas Symfony follows a more traditional synchronous programming paradigm. Swoole's event-driven architecture leverages non-blocking I/O operations to achieve high concurrency and scalability, making it a great choice for applications with a large number of concurrent connections. Symfony, on the other hand, is well-suited for building complex web applications with a more traditional request-response cycle.

  2. Performance: Swoole is known for its excellent performance, especially in scenarios that involve high concurrency and massive amounts of concurrent connections. Its scalability and efficiency can deliver significantly faster response times compared to Symfony. Symfony, while still performing well in a traditional web application context, may not be as performant as Swoole in highly concurrent scenarios.

  3. Usage Complexity: Swoole, being an event-driven framework, requires developers to have a good understanding of asynchronous programming concepts. This can make the learning curve steeper for developers who are not familiar with asynchronous programming or have experience primarily with traditional synchronous frameworks. Symfony, on the other hand, has a more straightforward learning curve and a larger community of developers, making it an accessible choice for developers of varying skill levels.

  4. Ecosystem and Community Support: Symfony has a well-established ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, bundles, and tools, making it easier for developers to find and reuse existing components. Symfony also has a larger community, which means more tutorials, documentation, and support available. While Swoole does have a growing ecosystem and community, it may not be as extensive as Symfony's, making it potentially more challenging to find ready-made solutions for certain use cases.

  5. Use Cases: Swoole is particularly well-suited for building high-performance applications that require handling a large number of concurrent connections, such as real-time applications, chat applications, or gaming servers. Its event-driven architecture and low-level control make it a powerful tool for such use cases. Conversely, Symfony shines in building complex, feature-rich web applications that follow the traditional request-response cycle. Its extensive set of components, plugins, and community support make it a preferred choice for building robust and scalable web applications.

  6. Maturity and Stability: Symfony, being a mature and widely adopted framework, has proven its stability and reliability over the years. It has a well-documented codebase, thorough testing, and regular updates. Swoole, while also stable and reliable, may be considered relatively newer compared to Symfony. As such, developers may take into account the maturity and stability of the framework when considering it for their projects.

In summary, Swoole offers an event-driven, high-performance paradigm with excellent scalability and is suitable for building applications with a large number of concurrent connections. Symfony, on the other hand, follows a more traditional synchronous paradigm and is better suited for complex web applications with a larger community and a mature ecosystem. The choice between the two frameworks ultimately depends on the specific requirements and use cases of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Symfony, Swoole

Fabian
Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGraphQLGraphQLC++C++SymfonySymfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony
Symfony
Swoole
Swoole

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

-
Mobile API Server; Internet Of Things; Micro Services; Web API Or Web Application; Gaming Servers; Live Chat Systems
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.7K
GitHub Stars
18.8K
GitHub Forks
9.7K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
Stacks
8.5K
Stacks
57
Followers
6.2K
Followers
134
Votes
1.1K
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Open source
  • 149
    Php
  • 130
    Community
  • 129
    Dependency injection
  • 122
    Professional
Cons
  • 10
    Too many dependency
  • 8
    Lot of config files
  • 4
    YMAL
  • 3
    Feature creep
  • 1
    Bloated
Pros
  • 7
    Async programming
  • 6
    Really multi thread
  • 5
    Blazing fast
  • 3
    High-performance http, websocket, tcp, udp server
  • 3
    Coroutines concurrency model
Integrations
CakePHP
CakePHP
PHP
PHP
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
CentOS
CentOS
PHP
PHP
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
React
React
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
PHPUnit
PHPUnit

What are some alternatives to Symfony, Swoole?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase