StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Swoole vs Tornado

Swoole vs Tornado

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tornado
Tornado
Stacks530
Followers409
Votes167
GitHub Stars22.3K
Forks5.5K
Swoole
Swoole
Stacks57
Followers134
Votes27
GitHub Stars18.8K
Forks3.2K

Swoole vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Swoole and Tornado are both asynchronous networking frameworks for building high-performance servers in PHP and Python, respectively.

1. **Language Compatibility**: Swoole is specifically designed to work with PHP, while Tornado is a Python-based framework, meaning developers must choose the framework that aligns with their preferred programming language.
2. **Event Loop Implementation**: Swoole utilizes an event-driven architecture through coroutines, while Tornado relies on a single-threaded event loop with callbacks, offering different approaches to managing asynchronous operations.
3. **Performance Overhead**: Swoole generally has lower performance overhead compared to Tornado due to its direct integration with the PHP language, potentially resulting in faster application execution.
4. **Concurrency Model**: Swoole supports multi-threading and parallel processing for concurrent connections, while Tornado emphasizes non-blocking I/O and callback-based concurrency to handle multiple connections efficiently.
5. **Ecosystem and Community**: Tornado has a well-established community and extensive ecosystem of libraries and tools, whereas Swoole, being relatively newer, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support and development.
6. **Documentation and Learning Curve**: Tornado has comprehensive documentation and may have a gentler learning curve for Python developers, whereas Swoole's documentation may vary in completeness or accessibility and could pose a steeper learning curve for PHP developers.

In Summary, Swoole and Tornado differ in language compatibility, event loop implementation, performance overhead, concurrency model, ecosystem, community involvement, and documentation, impacting developers' choice based on their programming language preference, application requirements, and familiarity with the framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tornado
Tornado
Swoole
Swoole

By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

-
Mobile API Server; Internet Of Things; Micro Services; Web API Or Web Application; Gaming Servers; Live Chat Systems
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.3K
GitHub Stars
18.8K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
Stacks
530
Stacks
57
Followers
409
Followers
134
Votes
167
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Open source
  • 31
    So fast
  • 27
    Great for microservices architecture
  • 20
    Websockets
  • 17
    Simple
Cons
  • 2
    Event loop is complicated
Pros
  • 7
    Async programming
  • 6
    Really multi thread
  • 5
    Blazing fast
  • 3
    High-performance http, websocket, tcp, udp server
  • 3
    Coroutines concurrency model
Integrations
Python
Python
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
CentOS
CentOS
PHP
PHP
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
React
React
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
PHPUnit
PHPUnit

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Swoole?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase