StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. TimescaleDB vs Vertica

TimescaleDB vs Vertica

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vertica
Vertica
Stacks90
Followers120
Votes16
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Stacks227
Followers374
Votes44
GitHub Stars20.6K
Forks988

TimescaleDB vs Vertica: What are the differences?

Introduction: TimescaleDB and Vertica are both popular databases that are designed for handling large-scale time-series data. However, there are key differences between the two that cater to specific use cases and requirements.

  1. Data Model: TimescaleDB is an extension of PostgreSQL, offering a relational and object-oriented data model with support for time-series data via hypertables. On the other hand, Vertica is a columnar database with a more specialized data model optimized for analytical queries on large datasets.

  2. Scalability: TimescaleDB is designed for scaling out on a cluster of servers using PostgreSQL's native replication mechanisms, enabling horizontal scalability. In contrast, Vertica utilizes a shared-nothing architecture that allows it to scale both horizontally and vertically to handle massive datasets efficiently.

  3. Consistency and Durability: TimescaleDB provides strong consistency guarantees and durability by leveraging PostgreSQL's transaction model, ensuring data integrity in the face of failures. Vertica offers eventual consistency with a focus on performance, sacrificing some level of consistency for faster query processing.

  4. Indexing and Query Optimization: TimescaleDB utilizes a combination of traditional B-tree indexes and hypertable-specific optimizations, such as time-partitioning and continuous aggregates, to enhance query performance. Vertica uses sophisticated projection and segmentation techniques to optimize query execution and leverage columnar storage for faster data retrieval.

  5. Open Source vs. Commercial Features: TimescaleDB is fully open-source and community-driven, with features and extensions developed in the open. In comparison, Vertica offers a commercial license with advanced features like in-database machine learning and workload management that cater to enterprise requirements.

  6. Use Cases and Workloads: TimescaleDB is well-suited for real-time analytics, monitoring, and IoT applications that require fast ingestion and querying of time-series data. Vertica excels in data warehousing, business intelligence, and decision support systems where complex analytical queries and ad-hoc reporting are common.

In Summary, TimescaleDB and Vertica differ in their data models, scalability options, consistency guarantees, indexing strategies, licensing models, and target use cases, making them suitable for distinct types of applications and workloads.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vertica, TimescaleDB

Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vertica
Vertica
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB

It provides a best-in-class, unified analytics platform that will forever be independent from underlying infrastructure.

TimescaleDB: An open-source database built for analyzing time-series data with the power and convenience of SQL — on premise, at the edge, or in the cloud.

Analyze All of Your Data. No longer move data or settle for siloed views;Achieve Scale and Performance;Fear of growing data volumes and users is a thing of the past;Future-Proof Your Analytics
Packaged as a PostgreSQL extension;Full ANSI SQL;JOINs (e.g., across PostgreSQL tables);Complex queries;Secondary indexes;Composite indexes;Support for very high cardinality data;Triggers;Constraints;UPSERTS;JSON/JSONB;Ability to ingest out of order data;Ability to perform accurate rollups;Data retention policies;Fast deletes;Integration with PostGIS and the rest of the PostgreSQL ecosystem;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
20.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
988
Stacks
90
Stacks
227
Followers
120
Followers
374
Votes
16
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Shared nothing or shared everything architecture
  • 1
    Reduce costs as reduced hardware is required
  • 1
    Offers users the freedom to choose deployment mode
  • 1
    Partition pruning and predicate push down on Parquet
  • 1
    Vertica is the only product which offers partition prun
Pros
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Easy Query Language
  • 7
    Time-series data analysis
  • 5
    Established postgresql API and support
  • 4
    Reliable
Cons
  • 5
    Licensing issues when running on managed databases
Integrations
Oracle
Oracle
Golang
Golang
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Sass
Sass
Mode
Mode
PowerBI
PowerBI
Tableau
Tableau
Talend
Talend
Prometheus
Prometheus
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
Ruby
Ruby
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Django
Django
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
pgAdmin
pgAdmin
Python
Python
Kafka
Kafka
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to Vertica, TimescaleDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase