WCF vs uWebSockets

Overview

WCF

Stacks125

Followers107

Votes5

uWebSockets

Stacks16

Followers52

Votes0

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks1.8K

WCF vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Performance**: uWebSockets is known for its high performance as it is written in C++ and designed for speed, whereas WCF is built on the .NET framework which may not be as fast.
2. **Operating System Support**: uWebSockets can be compiled on various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, while WCF is primarily designed for Windows environments.
3. **Protocol Support**: uWebSockets primarily supports WebSockets protocol and offers WebSocket extensions, while WCF supports a variety of communication protocols like HTTP, TCP, Named Pipes, etc.
4. **Community Support**: uWebSockets has a more active open-source community and frequent updates, whereas WCF is a proprietary technology from Microsoft with limited community support.
5. **Ease of Use**: uWebSockets is known for its simple and easy-to-use API, making it ideal for quick integration, while WCF can be more complex due to its configuration options and settings.
6. **Scalability**: uWebSockets is designed for high scalability and can handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, while WCF may require more resources for scaling in high-demand scenarios.

In Summary, uWebSockets and WCF differ in terms of performance, operating system support, protocol support, community support, ease of use, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on WCF, uWebSockets

Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

WCF	uWebSockets
It is a framework for building service-oriented applications. Using this, you can send data as asynchronous messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in an application.	It is a simple to use yet thoroughly optimized implementation of HTTP and WebSockets. It comes with built-in pub/sub support, HTTP routing, TLS 1.3, IPv6, permessage-deflate and is battle tested as one of the most popular implementations, reaching many end-users daily.
-	HTTP and Websockets;Built-in pub/sub support;HTTP routing
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 18.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.8K
Stacks 125	Stacks 16
Followers 107	Followers 52
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Classes	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	C++ Windows Linux macOS

What are some alternatives to WCF, uWebSockets?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

WCF vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Performance**: uWebSockets is known for its high performance as it is written in C++ and designed for speed, whereas WCF is built on the .NET framework which may not be as fast.
2. **Operating System Support**: uWebSockets can be compiled on various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, while WCF is primarily designed for Windows environments.
3. **Protocol Support**: uWebSockets primarily supports WebSockets protocol and offers WebSocket extensions, while WCF supports a variety of communication protocols like HTTP, TCP, Named Pipes, etc.
4. **Community Support**: uWebSockets has a more active open-source community and frequent updates, whereas WCF is a proprietary technology from Microsoft with limited community support.
5. **Ease of Use**: uWebSockets is known for its simple and easy-to-use API, making it ideal for quick integration, while WCF can be more complex due to its configuration options and settings.
6. **Scalability**: uWebSockets is designed for high scalability and can handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, while WCF may require more resources for scaling in high-demand scenarios.

In Summary, uWebSockets and WCF differ in terms of performance, operating system support, protocol support, community support, ease of use, and scalability.

WCF vs uWebSockets

Overview