Vespene vs Zuul CI

Overview

Vespene

Stacks2

Followers7

Votes0

Zuul CI

Stacks5

Followers21

Votes3

Vespene vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Integration with other tools: Vespene offers integrations with various tools like JIRA, Slack, and GitHub, making it easier to incorporate these tools into the CI/CD process. On the other hand, Zuul CI focuses more on integrating with OpenStack specific tools and services, catering to organizations working primarily with OpenStack infrastructure.
Scalability: Vespene is designed to be highly scalable, supporting large-scale deployments and complex workflows. In contrast, Zuul CI is known for its ability to handle massive scale projects and distributed systems, making it suitable for organizations managing extensive infrastructure and repositories.
Configuration: Vespene emphasizes a more straightforward and user-friendly configuration approach, making it easier for teams to set up and manage their CI pipelines. Zuul CI, on the other hand, is known for its complex configuration capabilities, providing fine-grained control over the CI/CD processes but requiring more expertise to set up and maintain.
Community support: Vespene has a growing community of users and contributors, providing a supportive environment for users to seek help and share resources. Zuul CI, being an integral part of the OpenStack community, benefits from a large user base and extensive documentation tailored to OpenStack users.
Customizability: Vespene offers a high level of customizability, allowing users to tailor the CI/CD pipelines to their specific needs and preferences easily. Zuul CI, while highly customizable, follows a more opinionated approach in terms of workflow and pipeline management, which may suit organizations looking for a more structured CI/CD solution.
Deployment flexibility: Vespene can be deployed on various platforms and environments, offering flexibility in choosing the deployment model that best fits the organization's requirements. In comparison, Zuul CI is tightly integrated with OpenStack and may require a specific infrastructure setup to leverage its full capabilities efficiently.

In Summary, Vespene and Zuul CI differ in their integrations, scalability, configuration, community support, customizability, and deployment flexibility, catering to diverse needs in the CI/CD landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vespene	Zuul CI
Vespene is a modern, streamlined build and self-service automation platform. Vespene is designed to combat chaos in complex software development and operations environments. As you might expect of any build system, builds can be launched manually, triggered from commits with Webhooks, or set off on timers with Scheduling.	It is an open source CI/CD platform specializing in gating changes across multiple systems and applications before landing a single patch.
-	Project Gating;CI/CD with Ansible;Cross-Project Dependencies
Statistics
Stacks 2	Stacks 5
Followers 7	Followers 21
Votes 0	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Hard to configure 1 Open-source Mostly used with Openstack 1 No vendor-lock In. Zero Cost
Integrations
Docker Slack GitHub	Zookeeper

What are some alternatives to Vespene, Zuul CI?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Vespene vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Integration with other tools: Vespene offers integrations with various tools like JIRA, Slack, and GitHub, making it easier to incorporate these tools into the CI/CD process. On the other hand, Zuul CI focuses more on integrating with OpenStack specific tools and services, catering to organizations working primarily with OpenStack infrastructure.
Scalability: Vespene is designed to be highly scalable, supporting large-scale deployments and complex workflows. In contrast, Zuul CI is known for its ability to handle massive scale projects and distributed systems, making it suitable for organizations managing extensive infrastructure and repositories.
Configuration: Vespene emphasizes a more straightforward and user-friendly configuration approach, making it easier for teams to set up and manage their CI pipelines. Zuul CI, on the other hand, is known for its complex configuration capabilities, providing fine-grained control over the CI/CD processes but requiring more expertise to set up and maintain.
Community support: Vespene has a growing community of users and contributors, providing a supportive environment for users to seek help and share resources. Zuul CI, being an integral part of the OpenStack community, benefits from a large user base and extensive documentation tailored to OpenStack users.
Customizability: Vespene offers a high level of customizability, allowing users to tailor the CI/CD pipelines to their specific needs and preferences easily. Zuul CI, while highly customizable, follows a more opinionated approach in terms of workflow and pipeline management, which may suit organizations looking for a more structured CI/CD solution.
Deployment flexibility: Vespene can be deployed on various platforms and environments, offering flexibility in choosing the deployment model that best fits the organization's requirements. In comparison, Zuul CI is tightly integrated with OpenStack and may require a specific infrastructure setup to leverage its full capabilities efficiently.

Vespene vs Zuul CI

Overview