Alternatives to Woodpecker logo

Alternatives to Woodpecker

Mailchimp, Hummingbird, Postman, Swagger UI, and Microsoft SharePoint are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Woodpecker.
6
11
+ 1
0

What is Woodpecker and what are its top alternatives?

It is a document automation platform and suite that empowers users to cut document prep time in half by automatically converting existing documents to standardized smart-templates.
Woodpecker is a tool in the Documentation as a Service & Tools category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Woodpecker

  • Mailchimp

    Mailchimp

    MailChimp helps you design email newsletters, share them on social networks, integrate with services you already use, and track your results. It's like your own personal publishing platform. ...

  • Hummingbird

    Hummingbird

    It is a library for compiling trained traditional ML models into tensor computations. It allows users to seamlessly leverage neural network frameworks (such as PyTorch) to accelerate traditional ML models. ...

  • Postman

    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Swagger UI

    Swagger UI

    Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API ...

  • Microsoft SharePoint

    Microsoft SharePoint

    It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization. ...

  • Google Docs

    Google Docs

    It is a word processor included as part of a free, web-based software office suite offered by Google. It brings your documents to life with smart editing and styling tools to help you easily format text and paragraphs. ...

  • Apiary

    Apiary

    It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves. ...

  • Gitbook

    Gitbook

    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team. ...

Woodpecker alternatives & related posts

Mailchimp logo

Mailchimp

18.7K
9.3K
1.2K
Easy email newsletters
18.7K
9.3K
+ 1
1.2K
PROS OF MAILCHIMP
  • 259
    Smooth setup & ui
  • 248
    Mailing list
  • 149
    Robust e-mail creation
  • 120
    Integrates with a lot of external services
  • 109
    Custom templates
  • 60
    Free tier
  • 49
    Great api
  • 42
    Great UI
  • 33
    A/B Testing Subject Lines
  • 30
    Broad feature set
  • 11
    Subscriber Analytics
  • 9
    Great interface. The standard for email marketing
  • 8
    Great documentation
  • 8
    Mandrill integration
  • 7
    Segmentation
  • 6
    Best deliverability; helps you be the good guy
  • 5
    Facebook Integration
  • 5
    Autoresponders
  • 3
    RSS-to-email
  • 3
    Co-branding
  • 3
    Customization
  • 3
    Embedded signup forms
  • 2
    Automation
  • 1
    Great logo
  • 1
    Groups
  • 0
    Landing pages
CONS OF MAILCHIMP
  • 2
    Super expensive
  • 1
    No Terraform provider
  • 1
    Poor API
  • 1
    Charged based on subscribers as opposed to emails sent

related Mailchimp posts

Hummingbird logo

Hummingbird

3
7
0
Compile trained ML models into tensor computation (By Microsoft)
3
7
+ 1
0
PROS OF HUMMINGBIRD
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF HUMMINGBIRD
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Hummingbird posts

      Postman logo

      Postman

      64.1K
      52.1K
      1.8K
      Only complete API development environment
      64.1K
      52.1K
      + 1
      1.8K
      PROS OF POSTMAN
      • 486
        Easy to use
      • 369
        Great tool
      • 275
        Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
      • 156
        Easy setup, looks good
      • 143
        The best api workflow out there
      • 53
        It's the best
      • 53
        History feature
      • 44
        Adds real value to my workflow
      • 42
        Great interface that magically predicts your needs
      • 34
        The best in class app
      • 11
        Can save and share script
      • 9
        Fully featured without looking cluttered
      • 7
        Option to run scrips
      • 7
        Collections
      • 7
        Global/Environment Variables
      • 6
        Dead simple and useful. Excellent
      • 6
        Dark theme easy on the eyes
      • 6
        Shareable Collections
      • 5
        Great integration with newman
      • 5
        Awesome customer support
      • 4
        Documentation
      • 4
        The test script is useful
      • 4
        Simple
      • 3
        Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
      • 3
        Easy as pie
      • 3
        Saves responses
      • 3
        This has simplified my testing significantly
      • 2
        API-network
      • 2
        Mocking API calls with predefined response
      • 2
        I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
      • 1
        Graph
      • 1
        Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
      • 1
        Continuous integration using newman
      • 1
        Now supports GraphQL
      • 1
        Postman Runner CI Integration
      • 1
        Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
      • 0
        Runner
      • 0
        <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
      CONS OF POSTMAN
      • 9
        Stores credentials in HTTP
      • 7
        Poor GraphQL support
      • 7
        Bloated features and UI
      • 6
        Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
      • 2
        Expensive
      • 1
        Support websocket
      • 1
        Import curl
      • 1
        Import swagger
      • 1
        Can't prompt for per-request variables

      related Postman posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.1M views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      Swagger UI logo

      Swagger UI

      1.6K
      1.4K
      201
      A Collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation
      1.6K
      1.4K
      + 1
      201
      PROS OF SWAGGER UI
      • 46
        Open Source
      • 34
        Can execute api calls from the documentation
      • 28
        Free to use
      • 19
        Customizable
      • 14
        Easy to implement in .Net
      • 13
        Mature, clean spec
      • 11
        API Visualization
      • 9
        Coverage
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 6
        Scaffolding
      • 5
        Vibrant and active community
      • 4
        Elegant
      • 3
        Adopted by tm forum api
      • 2
        Clear for React
      • 1
        Can deploy API to AWS API Gateway and AWS Lambda
      CONS OF SWAGGER UI
      • 2
        Need to learn YAML and RAML
      • 1
        Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages
      • 1
        Documentation doesn't look that good
      • 1
        You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
      • 1
        Does not support hypermedia

      related Swagger UI posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.1M views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      Microsoft SharePoint logo

      Microsoft SharePoint

      306
      203
      6
      Content collaboration for the modern workplace
      306
      203
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT
      • 2
        Great online support
      • 1
        Perfect version control
      • 1
        Stable Platform
      • 1
        Seamless intergration with MS Office
      • 1
        Secure
      CONS OF MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT
      • 2
        Rigid, hard to add external applicaions
      • 1
        User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned

      related Microsoft SharePoint posts

      Google Docs logo

      Google Docs

      235
      153
      5
      Real-time docs collaboration
      235
      153
      + 1
      5
      PROS OF GOOGLE DOCS
      • 3
        It's simple, but expansive
      • 1
        Free
      • 1
        Fast and simple
      CONS OF GOOGLE DOCS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Google Docs posts

        Jason Barry
        Cofounder at FeaturePeek · | 10 upvotes · 169.1K views

        If you're a developer using Google Docs or Google Sheets... just stop. There are much better alternatives these days that provide a better user and developer experience.

        At FeaturePeek, we use slite for our internal documents and knowledge tracking. Slite's look and feel is similar to Slack's, so if you use Slack, you'll feel right at home. Slite is great for keeping tabs on meeting notes, internal documentation, drafting marketing content, writing pitches... any long-form text writing that we do as a company happens in Slite. I'm able to be up-to-date with everyone on my team by viewing our team activity. I feel more organized using Slite as opposed to GDocs or GDrive.

        Airtable is also absolutely killer – you'll never want to use Google Sheets again. Have you noticed that with most spreadsheet apps, if you have a tall or wide cell, your screen jumps all over the place when you scroll? With Airtable, you can scroll by screen pixels instead of by spreadsheet cells – this makes a huge difference! It's one of those things that you don't really notice at first, but once you do, you can't go back. This is just one example of the UX improvements that Airtable has to the previous generation of spreadsheet apps – there are plenty more.

        Also, their API is a breeze to use. If you're logged in, the docs fill in values from your tables and account, so it feels personalized to you.

        See more
        Apiary logo

        Apiary

        221
        275
        108
        Integrated API documentation, prototyping and testing
        221
        275
        + 1
        108
        PROS OF APIARY
        • 28
          Easy to use
        • 19
          Free to use
        • 12
          Traffic inspector
        • 11
          Free
        • 10
          Collaboration
        • 7
          Mock API
        • 4
          Dashboard
        • 3
          Customization
        • 2
          30 Days Trial
        • 2
          Documentation
        • 2
          Access Control
        • 2
          Validate API Documentation
        • 1
          API explorer
        • 1
          Clean syntax
        • 1
          Provisioning
        • 1
          Shared API blueprint templates
        • 1
          Github integration helps with collaboration
        • 1
          Code auto-generation
        CONS OF APIARY
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Apiary posts

          Gitbook logo

          Gitbook

          157
          237
          3
          Document Everything! For you, your users and your team
          157
          237
          + 1
          3
          PROS OF GITBOOK
          • 2
            Integrated high-quality editor
          • 1
            Prueba
          CONS OF GITBOOK
          • 1
            Just sync with GitHub

          related Gitbook posts