Alternatives to Alamofire logo

Alternatives to Alamofire

Just, axios, Retrofit, Firebase, and Postman are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Alamofire.
174
94
+ 1
0

What is Alamofire and what are its top alternatives?

Alamofire is a popular networking library written in Swift for iOS development, offering a rich set of features such as URL request/response, JSON parameter encoding, file uploads, and more. It simplifies networking tasks and provides a clean and elegant way to make network requests in iOS applications. However, one limitation of Alamofire is its heavy dependency on the Alamofire framework, which may not always be necessary for simple networking tasks.

  1. AFNetworking: AFNetworking is a powerful networking library for iOS and macOS, offering features like HTTP/HTTPS networking, API management, and network reachability monitoring. Pros include a well-established library with a large user base, while cons may include a bit of a learning curve for beginners.
  2. Moya: Moya is a Swift network abstraction layer built on top of Alamofire, providing a simplified and strongly-typed network layer. Key features include easy API customization, testability, and reduced boilerplate code. Pros include a cleaner and more modular code structure, while cons may include some limitations in customization compared to using Alamofire directly.
  3. URLSession: URLSession is Apple's built-in networking framework that allows developers to make HTTP and HTTPS requests in iOS applications. Key features include background transfers, task prioritization, and URLSessionDelegate for handling authentication challenges. Pros include native support and familiarity for iOS developers, while cons may include more manual setup compared to using networking libraries like Alamofire.
  4. PromiseKit: PromiseKit is a Swift library that simplifies asynchronous programming by providing a way to work with promises and futures. Key features include chaining promises, error handling, and asynchronous task composition. Pros include improved readability and maintainability of asynchronous code, while cons may include additional dependencies for handling network requests compared to using Alamofire directly.
  5. SwiftHTTP: SwiftHTTP is a lightweight library for making HTTP requests in Swift, offering features like parameter encoding, multipart uploads, and basic authentication support. Pros include simplicity and ease of use for basic networking tasks, while cons may include limited advanced features compared to more comprehensive libraries like Alamofire.

Top Alternatives to Alamofire

  • Just
    Just

    It is a build task definition library. It stands on the shoulders of two excellent and well tested libraries: undertaker and yargs. It also provides what we call "stacks" to complete the workflow of building a repository. ...

  • axios
    axios

    It is a Javascript library used to make http requests from node.js or XMLHttpRequests from the browser and it supports the Promise API that is native to JS ES6. ...

  • Retrofit
    Retrofit

    Retrofit turns your HTTP API into a Java interface

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

  • Google Maps
    Google Maps

    Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow. ...

Alamofire alternatives & related posts

Just logo

Just

24
0
A library that organizes build tasks for your JS projects
24
0
PROS OF JUST
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JUST
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Just posts

      axios logo

      axios

      3.4K
      0
      Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
      3.4K
      0
      PROS OF AXIOS
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AXIOS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related axios posts

          I built a project using Quasar Framework with Vue.js, vuex and axios on the frontend and Go, Gin Gonic and PostgreSQL on the backend. Deployment was realized using Docker and Docker Compose. Now I can build the desktop and the mobile app using a single code base on the frontend. UI responsiveness and performance of this stack is amazing.

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Vue RouterVue Routeraxiosaxios

          hello, I'm a newbie. is axios the same as Vue Router? Or can /should use both? thanks

          See more
          Retrofit logo

          Retrofit

          324
          0
          A type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java
          324
          0
          PROS OF RETROFIT
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF RETROFIT
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Retrofit posts

              Firebase logo

              Firebase

              41.5K
              2K
              The Realtime App Platform
              41.5K
              2K
              PROS OF FIREBASE
              • 371
                Realtime backend made easy
              • 270
                Fast and responsive
              • 242
                Easy setup
              • 215
                Real-time
              • 191
                JSON
              • 134
                Free
              • 128
                Backed by google
              • 83
                Angular adaptor
              • 68
                Reliable
              • 36
                Great customer support
              • 32
                Great documentation
              • 25
                Real-time synchronization
              • 21
                Mobile friendly
              • 19
                Rapid prototyping
              • 14
                Great security
              • 12
                Automatic scaling
              • 11
                Freakingly awesome
              • 8
                Super fast development
              • 8
                Angularfire is an amazing addition!
              • 8
                Chat
              • 6
                Firebase hosting
              • 6
                Built in user auth/oauth
              • 6
                Awesome next-gen backend
              • 6
                Ios adaptor
              • 4
                Speed of light
              • 4
                Very easy to use
              • 3
                Great
              • 3
                It's made development super fast
              • 3
                Brilliant for startups
              • 2
                Free hosting
              • 2
                Cloud functions
              • 2
                JS Offline and Sync suport
              • 2
                Low battery consumption
              • 2
                .net
              • 2
                The concurrent updates create a great experience
              • 2
                Push notification
              • 2
                I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
              • 2
                Great all-round functionality
              • 2
                Free authentication solution
              • 1
                Easy Reactjs integration
              • 1
                Google's support
              • 1
                Free SSL
              • 1
                CDN & cache out of the box
              • 1
                Easy to use
              • 1
                Large
              • 1
                Faster workflow
              • 1
                Serverless
              • 1
                Good Free Limits
              • 1
                Simple and easy
              CONS OF FIREBASE
              • 31
                Can become expensive
              • 16
                No open source, you depend on external company
              • 15
                Scalability is not infinite
              • 9
                Not Flexible Enough
              • 7
                Cant filter queries
              • 3
                Very unstable server
              • 3
                No Relational Data
              • 2
                Too many errors
              • 2
                No offline sync

              related Firebase posts

              Stephen Gheysens
              Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.9M views

              Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

              My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

              See more
              Eugene Cheah

              For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

              We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

              If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

              1. <5ms CPU time limit
              2. Incompatible with express.js
              3. one script limitation per domain

              Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

              For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

              More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

              See more
              Postman logo

              Postman

              95.5K
              1.8K
              Only complete API development environment
              95.5K
              1.8K
              PROS OF POSTMAN
              • 490
                Easy to use
              • 369
                Great tool
              • 276
                Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
              • 156
                Easy setup, looks good
              • 144
                The best api workflow out there
              • 53
                It's the best
              • 53
                History feature
              • 44
                Adds real value to my workflow
              • 43
                Great interface that magically predicts your needs
              • 35
                The best in class app
              • 12
                Can save and share script
              • 10
                Fully featured without looking cluttered
              • 8
                Collections
              • 8
                Option to run scrips
              • 8
                Global/Environment Variables
              • 7
                Shareable Collections
              • 7
                Dead simple and useful. Excellent
              • 7
                Dark theme easy on the eyes
              • 6
                Awesome customer support
              • 6
                Great integration with newman
              • 5
                Documentation
              • 5
                Simple
              • 5
                The test script is useful
              • 4
                Saves responses
              • 4
                This has simplified my testing significantly
              • 4
                Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
              • 4
                Easy as pie
              • 3
                API-network
              • 3
                I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
              • 3
                Mocking API calls with predefined response
              • 2
                Now supports GraphQL
              • 2
                Postman Runner CI Integration
              • 2
                Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
              • 2
                Continuous integration using newman
              • 2
                Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
              • 2
                Runner
              • 2
                Graph
              • 1
                <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
              CONS OF POSTMAN
              • 10
                Stores credentials in HTTP
              • 9
                Bloated features and UI
              • 8
                Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
              • 7
                Poor GraphQL support
              • 5
                Expensive
              • 3
                Not free after 5 users
              • 3
                Can't prompt for per-request variables
              • 1
                Import swagger
              • 1
                Support websocket
              • 1
                Import curl

              related Postman posts

              Noah Zoschke
              Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.1M views

              We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

              Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

              Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

              This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

              Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

              Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

              Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

              See more
              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.6M views

              Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

              • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
              • npm as package manager
              • NestJS as Node.js framework
              • TypeScript as programming language
              • ExpressJS as web server
              • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
              • Postman as a tool for API development
              • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
              • JSON Web Token for access token management

              The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

              • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
              • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
              • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
              • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
              See more
              Postman logo

              Postman

              95.5K
              1.8K
              Only complete API development environment
              95.5K
              1.8K
              PROS OF POSTMAN
              • 490
                Easy to use
              • 369
                Great tool
              • 276
                Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
              • 156
                Easy setup, looks good
              • 144
                The best api workflow out there
              • 53
                It's the best
              • 53
                History feature
              • 44
                Adds real value to my workflow
              • 43
                Great interface that magically predicts your needs
              • 35
                The best in class app
              • 12
                Can save and share script
              • 10
                Fully featured without looking cluttered
              • 8
                Collections
              • 8
                Option to run scrips
              • 8
                Global/Environment Variables
              • 7
                Shareable Collections
              • 7
                Dead simple and useful. Excellent
              • 7
                Dark theme easy on the eyes
              • 6
                Awesome customer support
              • 6
                Great integration with newman
              • 5
                Documentation
              • 5
                Simple
              • 5
                The test script is useful
              • 4
                Saves responses
              • 4
                This has simplified my testing significantly
              • 4
                Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
              • 4
                Easy as pie
              • 3
                API-network
              • 3
                I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
              • 3
                Mocking API calls with predefined response
              • 2
                Now supports GraphQL
              • 2
                Postman Runner CI Integration
              • 2
                Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
              • 2
                Continuous integration using newman
              • 2
                Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
              • 2
                Runner
              • 2
                Graph
              • 1
                <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
              CONS OF POSTMAN
              • 10
                Stores credentials in HTTP
              • 9
                Bloated features and UI
              • 8
                Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
              • 7
                Poor GraphQL support
              • 5
                Expensive
              • 3
                Not free after 5 users
              • 3
                Can't prompt for per-request variables
              • 1
                Import swagger
              • 1
                Support websocket
              • 1
                Import curl

              related Postman posts

              Noah Zoschke
              Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.1M views

              We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

              Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

              Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

              This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

              Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

              Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

              Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

              See more
              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.6M views

              Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

              • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
              • npm as package manager
              • NestJS as Node.js framework
              • TypeScript as programming language
              • ExpressJS as web server
              • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
              • Postman as a tool for API development
              • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
              • JSON Web Token for access token management

              The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

              • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
              • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
              • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
              • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
              See more
              Stack Overflow logo

              Stack Overflow

              69.6K
              893
              Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
              69.6K
              893
              PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
              • 257
                Scary smart community
              • 206
                Knows all
              • 142
                Voting system
              • 134
                Good questions
              • 83
                Good SEO
              • 22
                Addictive
              • 14
                Tight focus
              • 10
                Share and gain knowledge
              • 7
                Useful
              • 3
                Fast loading
              • 2
                Gamification
              • 1
                Knows everyone
              • 1
                Experts share experience and answer questions
              • 1
                Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
              • 1
                Questions answered quickly
              • 1
                No annoying ads
              • 1
                No spam
              • 1
                Fast community response
              • 1
                Good moderators
              • 1
                Quick answers from users
              • 1
                Good answers
              • 1
                User reputation ranking
              • 1
                Efficient answers
              • 1
                Leading developer community
              CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
              • 3
                Not welcoming to newbies
              • 3
                Unfair downvoting
              • 3
                Unfriendly moderators
              • 3
                No opinion based questions
              • 3
                Mean users
              • 2
                Limited to types of questions it can accept

              related Stack Overflow posts

              Tom Klein

              Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

              See more
              Google Maps logo

              Google Maps

              42K
              567
              Build highly customisable maps with your own content and imagery
              42K
              567
              PROS OF GOOGLE MAPS
              • 253
                Free
              • 136
                Address input through maps api
              • 82
                Sharable Directions
              • 47
                Google Earth
              • 46
                Unique
              • 3
                Custom maps designing
              CONS OF GOOGLE MAPS
              • 5
                Google Attributions and logo
              • 2
                Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete

              related Google Maps posts

              Tom Klein

              Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

              See more

              A huge component of our product relies on gathering public data about locations of interest. Google Places API gives us that ability in the most efficient way. Since we are primarily going to be using as google data as a source of information for our MVP, we might as well start integrating the Google Places API in our system. We have worked with Google Maps in the past and we might take some inspiration from our previous projects onto this one.

              See more