StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Amazon CodeGuru vs RuboCop

Amazon CodeGuru vs RuboCop

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41
Amazon CodeGuru
Amazon CodeGuru
Stacks68
Followers151
Votes24

Amazon CodeGuru vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Introduction In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Amazon CodeGuru and RuboCop, two popular code analysis tools used by developers to improve code quality.

  1. Purpose: Amazon CodeGuru is a machine learning-powered code review service that aims to help developers improve code quality by identifying issues such as concurrency errors, resource leaks, and inefficient code. RuboCop, on the other hand, is a static code analyzer and formatter for Ruby code that enforces a consistent coding style and helps identify potential errors and inconsistencies.

  2. Supported Languages: Amazon CodeGuru currently supports Java and Python, allowing developers in those languages to benefit from its code review and profiling capabilities. RuboCop, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Ruby code, providing a set of rules and guidelines tailored to Ruby developers.

  3. Automation: Amazon CodeGuru offers automated code reviews and profiling, leveraging machine learning algorithms to identify issues and provide recommendations to developers. RuboCop, while offering automated code analysis, relies on predefined rules and configurations which can be customized based on the project's needs.

  4. Integration: Amazon CodeGuru seamlessly integrates with popular code repositories and CI/CD pipelines, allowing developers to incorporate code reviews and profiling directly into their development workflows. RuboCop can be integrated into continuous integration tools like Jenkins and Travis CI to automate code analysis as part of the build process.

  5. Cost: Amazon CodeGuru is a paid service that offers a free tier for users to evaluate the service, with pricing based on the lines of code analyzed and the type of analysis performed. RuboCop, on the other hand, is an open-source tool available for free, making it a cost-effective option for developers looking to improve their Ruby code quality.

In Summary, Amazon CodeGuru and RuboCop differ in their purpose, supported languages, level of automation, integration capabilities, and cost, providing developers with a choice based on their specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RuboCop, Amazon CodeGuru

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop
RuboCop
Amazon CodeGuru
Amazon CodeGuru

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

-
Automate code reviews; Fast and reliable code issue detection; Trained on decades of knowledge and experience; Understand the runtime behavior of applications; Intelligent recommendations; Always-on profiling of applications in production
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
68
Followers
222
Followers
151
Votes
41
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Can automatically fix some problems
  • 4
    Customizable
Pros
  • 24
    What programming languages are supported?
Cons
  • 1
    Works only on Java code
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Java
Java
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, Amazon CodeGuru?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana