1. Integration Framework: Apache Camel is an open-source integration framework that focuses on routing and mediation rules, while Flynn is a platform designed for running and managing applications in a distributed environment.
2. Use Case: Apache Camel is commonly used for enterprise integration, messaging, and routing, while Flynn is used for deployment, scaling, and monitoring of applications across a cluster of machines.
3. Community Support: Apache Camel has a large and active community that provides extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of components, whereas Flynn has a smaller user base and may have limited community resources.
4. Scalability: Apache Camel can be used in a variety of architectures and systems, allowing for complex integration scenarios, whereas Flynn is focused on simplifying application deployment and management in containerized environments.
5. Learning Curve: Apache Camel may have a steeper learning curve due to its versatility and advanced features, while Flynn aims to provide a more straightforward approach to application deployment and scaling in a containerized environment.
6. Deployment Model: Apache Camel can be integrated into existing systems and architectures, while Flynn is designed to be a standalone platform for managing applications in a distributed environment.

In Summary, Apache Camel and Flynn serve different purposes in the realm of integration and application management, with Apache Camel focusing on integration framework capabilities and Flynn specializing in application deployment and scaling.