Atlantis vs Flynn

Overview

Flynn

Stacks14

Followers48

Votes16

GitHub Stars7.9K

Forks592

Atlantis

Stacks42

Followers28

Votes2

Atlantis vs Flynn: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Cost: Atlantis offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are only billed for the resources they consume. Flynn, on the other hand, provides a flat-rate monthly subscription with unlimited access to resources. This difference in pricing structure caters to different user needs and budgets.
Scalability: Atlantis is designed to easily scale up or down based on the user's requirements, providing flexibility in resource allocation. Flynn, however, has predefined tiers of resources which may limit scalability for users with fluctuating demands. This distinction caters to varying levels of resource management complexity.
Security: Atlantis emphasizes a secure network environment by utilizing encryption protocols and robust security measures to protect user data. Flynn prioritizes security through granular access controls and user permissions, ensuring the safety of sensitive information. This difference in security implementations reflects each platform's commitment to safeguarding data integrity.
Integration: Atlantis offers seamless integration with various third-party tools and services through APIs, allowing for customization and enhanced functionality. Flynn, on the other hand, focuses on its native features and optimizations without extensive integration capabilities. This distinction highlights the diverse approaches to interoperability and extensibility.
Support: Atlantis provides 24/7 customer support and dedicated account managers to assist users with technical issues and guidance. Flynn offers comprehensive documentation and community forums for self-help, with limited direct assistance. This difference in support options caters to users with different preferences for resolving issues.
Deployment: Atlantis enables quick deployment of applications through automated processes and configuration management, streamlining the setup for users. Flynn focuses on manual deployment methods that require more user input and configuration, potentially causing delays in application launch. This difference in deployment strategies reflects the platforms' emphasis on user convenience and control.

In Summary, Atlantis and Flynn offer distinct differences in cost, scalability, security, integration, support, and deployment approaches, catering to diverse user needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flynn	Atlantis
Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.	Atlantis is an Open Source PaaS for HTTP applications built on Docker and written in Go. It makes it easy to build and deploy applications in a safe, repeatable fashion, and flexibly route requests to the appropriate containers.
Flynn goes beyond 12 factor apps. Run any Linux process written in any language or framework, even stateful apps on your own servers or any public cloud.;Scaling or adding a new cluster is simple: just add more nodes. Everything is containerized, Flynn takes care of distributing work across the cluster.;Flynn is 100% free and open source. Flynn works great out of the box, and since Flynn is modular and API-driven it's easy to modify and swap components to suit your needs.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 592	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 14	Stacks 42
Followers 48	Followers 28
Votes 16	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Free 5 Supports few types of containers:libvirt-lxc, docker 2 Easy setup 2 PostgreSQL HA 1 12-factor methodology	Pros 2 It's so sunken
Integrations
Scala Rails Ruby Clojure Grails Java Golang Django PHP PostgreSQL	Docker

What are some alternatives to Flynn, Atlantis?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Atlantis vs Flynn: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Cost: Atlantis offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are only billed for the resources they consume. Flynn, on the other hand, provides a flat-rate monthly subscription with unlimited access to resources. This difference in pricing structure caters to different user needs and budgets.
Scalability: Atlantis is designed to easily scale up or down based on the user's requirements, providing flexibility in resource allocation. Flynn, however, has predefined tiers of resources which may limit scalability for users with fluctuating demands. This distinction caters to varying levels of resource management complexity.
Security: Atlantis emphasizes a secure network environment by utilizing encryption protocols and robust security measures to protect user data. Flynn prioritizes security through granular access controls and user permissions, ensuring the safety of sensitive information. This difference in security implementations reflects each platform's commitment to safeguarding data integrity.
Integration: Atlantis offers seamless integration with various third-party tools and services through APIs, allowing for customization and enhanced functionality. Flynn, on the other hand, focuses on its native features and optimizations without extensive integration capabilities. This distinction highlights the diverse approaches to interoperability and extensibility.
Support: Atlantis provides 24/7 customer support and dedicated account managers to assist users with technical issues and guidance. Flynn offers comprehensive documentation and community forums for self-help, with limited direct assistance. This difference in support options caters to users with different preferences for resolving issues.
Deployment: Atlantis enables quick deployment of applications through automated processes and configuration management, streamlining the setup for users. Flynn focuses on manual deployment methods that require more user input and configuration, potentially causing delays in application launch. This difference in deployment strategies reflects the platforms' emphasis on user convenience and control.

In Summary, Atlantis and Flynn offer distinct differences in cost, scalability, security, integration, support, and deployment approaches, catering to diverse user needs and preferences.

Atlantis vs Flynn

Overview