AWS CodeBuild vs Github Actions

Overview

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

AWS CodeBuild vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Different Platforms and Integration: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Github Actions is a feature in the Github platform for automating workflows. While both services offer similar functionalities, their primary difference lies in their platforms and integration options. CodeBuild is deeply integrated with other AWS services and can seamlessly build, test, and deploy applications on AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, Github Actions is tightly integrated with the Github platform and allows developers to automate workflows within the Github ecosystem.
Pricing Model: Another key difference between AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions is their pricing models. CodeBuild charges on a per-minute basis for the build duration and any additional compute resources used. In contrast, Github Actions provides a certain number of free job minutes per month for public repositories, and for private repositories, users are allocated a specific number of job minutes that renew each month. Any additional job minutes used beyond the allocated limit will incur charges.
Flexibility and Customization: While both AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions offer flexibility in configuring workflows, CodeBuild provides more customization options. CodeBuild supports the use of custom build environments, enabling developers to define their own Docker images with specific dependencies and tools. On the other hand, Github Actions has predefined runners that can be used for workflows but doesn't offer the same level of customization as CodeBuild.
Integration with Deployment Pipelines: AWS CodeBuild is extensively integrated with other services in the AWS ecosystem, such as CodePipeline, allowing for seamless integration with deployment pipelines. This integration enables developers to build a comprehensive CI/CD workflow using native AWS tools. In contrast, Github Actions can be integrated with various deployment tools, but it doesn't have the same level of native integration with AWS services as CodeBuild.
Scalability and Dedicated Hardware: AWS CodeBuild offers a highly scalable infrastructure that allows users to scale their builds based on demand. CodeBuild automatically provisions and manages the necessary compute resources to handle the build workload efficiently. Github Actions, on the other hand, relies on shared runners for workflows, which may result in varying performance depending on the workload and usage patterns of other users.
Visibility and Monitoring: Both AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions provide visibility into build and workflow executions. However, CodeBuild offers more comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing users to view detailed logs, track performance metrics, and set up notifications. CodeBuild integrates with other monitoring and logging services in the AWS ecosystem, providing a unified monitoring experience. Github Actions provides a basic level of logs and notifications but may not offer the same level of granularity and integration options as CodeBuild.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions differ in terms of platform integration, pricing models, customization options, integration with deployment pipelines, scalability, and monitoring capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AWS CodeBuild, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeBuild	GitHub Actions
AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 443	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 485	Followers 3.1K
Votes 43	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Bit bucket integration 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch Cons 2 Poor branch support	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No Deployment Projects
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise	GitHub

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeBuild, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Different Platforms and Integration: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Github Actions is a feature in the Github platform for automating workflows. While both services offer similar functionalities, their primary difference lies in their platforms and integration options. CodeBuild is deeply integrated with other AWS services and can seamlessly build, test, and deploy applications on AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, Github Actions is tightly integrated with the Github platform and allows developers to automate workflows within the Github ecosystem.
Pricing Model: Another key difference between AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions is their pricing models. CodeBuild charges on a per-minute basis for the build duration and any additional compute resources used. In contrast, Github Actions provides a certain number of free job minutes per month for public repositories, and for private repositories, users are allocated a specific number of job minutes that renew each month. Any additional job minutes used beyond the allocated limit will incur charges.
Flexibility and Customization: While both AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions offer flexibility in configuring workflows, CodeBuild provides more customization options. CodeBuild supports the use of custom build environments, enabling developers to define their own Docker images with specific dependencies and tools. On the other hand, Github Actions has predefined runners that can be used for workflows but doesn't offer the same level of customization as CodeBuild.
Integration with Deployment Pipelines: AWS CodeBuild is extensively integrated with other services in the AWS ecosystem, such as CodePipeline, allowing for seamless integration with deployment pipelines. This integration enables developers to build a comprehensive CI/CD workflow using native AWS tools. In contrast, Github Actions can be integrated with various deployment tools, but it doesn't have the same level of native integration with AWS services as CodeBuild.
Scalability and Dedicated Hardware: AWS CodeBuild offers a highly scalable infrastructure that allows users to scale their builds based on demand. CodeBuild automatically provisions and manages the necessary compute resources to handle the build workload efficiently. Github Actions, on the other hand, relies on shared runners for workflows, which may result in varying performance depending on the workload and usage patterns of other users.
Visibility and Monitoring: Both AWS CodeBuild and Github Actions provide visibility into build and workflow executions. However, CodeBuild offers more comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing users to view detailed logs, track performance metrics, and set up notifications. CodeBuild integrates with other monitoring and logging services in the AWS ecosystem, providing a unified monitoring experience. Github Actions provides a basic level of logs and notifications but may not offer the same level of granularity and integration options as CodeBuild.

AWS CodeBuild vs Github Actions

Overview