StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. AWS CodePipeline vs Weave Flux

AWS CodePipeline vs Weave Flux

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30
Weaveworks Flux
Weaveworks Flux
Stacks22
Followers28
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.9K
Forks1.1K

AWS CodePipeline vs Weave Flux: What are the differences?

< AWS CodePipeline and Weave Flux are two popular continuous delivery tools used in DevOps practices. Here are the key differences between them: >

  1. Hosting Environment: AWS CodePipeline is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that allows for easy automation of release pipelines. On the other hand, Weave Flux is an open-source project that can be deployed on-premises or in any cloud environment, providing more flexibility in hosting options.

  2. Supported Integrations: AWS CodePipeline integrates seamlessly with various AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeDeploy, offering a wide range of tools within the AWS ecosystem. Weave Flux, on the other hand, supports integrations with popular container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, enabling users to manage releases within Kubernetes clusters.

  3. Ease of Use: AWS CodePipeline provides a user-friendly graphical interface for setting up and visualizing the pipeline workflow, making it accessible to users with less technical expertise. In contrast, Weave Flux requires users to have a deeper understanding of Kubernetes and Docker concepts to effectively utilize its functionalities, making it more suitable for experienced DevOps teams.

  4. Customization Options: While AWS CodePipeline offers a range of pre-built actions and stages for defining pipelines, it has limited customization options compared to Weave Flux. Weave Flux allows for more granular control over the deployment process, with the ability to define custom release strategies and automation rules tailored to specific project requirements.

  5. Cost: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of pipelines and monthly active users. On the other hand, Weave Flux is completely free to use, making it a cost-effective option for teams looking to streamline their continuous delivery processes without incurring additional expenses.

  6. Community Support: Weave Flux benefits from a strong open-source community that actively contributes to its development and provides support through forums and documentation. While AWS CodePipeline has official support from AWS, the community-driven nature of Weave Flux allows for more extensive collaboration and knowledge sharing among users.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline offers an easy-to-use, fully integrated solution within the AWS ecosystem, while Weave Flux provides more flexibility, customization, and cost-effectiveness for users seeking advanced Kubernetes integration and community-driven support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Weaveworks Flux
Weaveworks Flux

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

It is the operator that makes GitOps happen in your cluster. It ensures that the cluster config matches the one in git and automates your deployments.

Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Automate Deployment; Increase Speed and Reliability; Troubleshoot Efficiently
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
551
Stacks
22
Followers
933
Followers
28
Votes
30
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Jenkins
Jenkins
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Docker
Docker
Git
Git
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI

What are some alternatives to AWS CodePipeline, Weaveworks Flux?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Kraken Deploy

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

DeployHQ

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana