StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Azure Cognitive Search vs Elasticsearch

Azure Cognitive Search vs Elasticsearch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Azure Cognitive Search
Azure Cognitive Search
Stacks39
Followers67
Votes1

Azure Cognitive Search vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch are two popular search engines used for indexing and querying data. While they both provide search capabilities, there are certain key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences in detail.

  1. Scalability and Performance: One key difference between Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch is their scalability and performance capabilities. Azure Cognitive Search is a fully managed service that offers automatic scaling and load balancing, making it easier to handle large amounts of data and queries without worrying about infrastructure management. On the other hand, Elasticsearch offers distributed architecture and sharding, allowing for horizontal scaling across multiple nodes. This gives Elasticsearch the advantage of being able to handle massive volumes of data and perform fast searches in real-time.

  2. Data Integration and Ecosystem: Another significant difference lies in the data integration and ecosystem support. Azure Cognitive Search is tightly integrated with other Azure services, providing seamless integration with Azure Storage, Azure SQL Database, and other Azure resources. It also supports various connectors for common data sources like SharePoint and SQL Server. In contrast, Elasticsearch is part of the ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana) and offers integration with a wide range of technologies and tools. It has extensive support for data ingestion, log parsing, and visualization through Logstash and Kibana, making it a popular choice in log analytics and monitoring use cases.

  3. Document Processing and Enrichment: Azure Cognitive Search provides built-in AI capabilities for document processing and enrichment. It offers language detection, entity recognition, key phrase extraction, and sentiment analysis out of the box. This allows users to extract valuable insights from unstructured data and leverage AI features without the need for additional services or custom code. On the other hand, Elasticsearch does not offer these built-in AI capabilities. However, it provides powerful text analysis features like tokenization, stemming, and synonym expansion, which can be used to enhance search results and perform linguistic processing.

  4. Managed Service vs. Self-Hosting: Azure Cognitive Search is a fully managed service provided by Microsoft, which means all the infrastructure management, updates, and maintenance tasks are handled by Microsoft. This makes it an ideal choice for organizations looking for a hassle-free search solution with minimal maintenance overhead. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is open source and can be self-hosted on-premises or on cloud infrastructure. While self-hosting provides more control, it requires additional effort in terms of setup, configuration, and ongoing management.

  5. Query and Filtering Capabilities: Both Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch provide rich query and filtering capabilities. However, there are some differences in their query DSL (Domain-Specific Language) syntax and supported features. Azure Cognitive Search uses the simple query syntax by default, which is easier to use for basic text searches. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, offers a powerful query DSL that allows for complex queries, aggregations, and filters. It also provides advanced features like scoring, relevance tuning, and geo-spatial search, giving users more flexibility and control over their search queries.

  6. Pricing Model: The pricing model is another difference between Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch. Azure Cognitive Search follows a consumption-based pricing model, where you pay for the resources used, including indexing, searching, and storage. The pricing is transparent and predictable, making it easier to estimate costs. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is open source and free to use. However, if you opt for managed Elasticsearch services like Amazon Elasticsearch Service or Elastic Cloud, you will incur costs based on the instance size, storage, and data transfer.

In summary, the key differences between Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch include scalability and performance, data integration and ecosystem support, document processing and enrichment capabilities, managed service vs. self-hosting, query and filtering capabilities, and pricing models. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, Azure Cognitive Search

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Azure Cognitive Search
Azure Cognitive Search

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

It is the only cloud search service with built-in AI capabilities that enrich all types of information to easily identify and explore relevant content at scale. Formerly known as Azure Search, it uses the same integrated Microsoft natural language stack that Bing and Office have used for more than a decade and AI services across vision, language and speech. Spend more time innovating and less time maintaining a complex cloud search solution.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Start, maintain and scale with minimal investment;Create searchable content using integrated AI;Customise to meet goals and industry requirements
Statistics
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
39
Followers
27.1K
Followers
67
Votes
1.6K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 1
    111
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Postman
Postman
Java
Java
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
C#
C#
PowerShell
PowerShell

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Azure Cognitive Search?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Quickwit

Quickwit

It is the next-gen search & analytics engine built for logs. It is designed from the ground up to offer cost-efficiency and high reliability on large data sets. Its benefits are most apparent in multi-tenancy or multi-index settings.

Bonsai

Bonsai

Your customers expect fast, near-magical results from your search. Help them find what they’re looking for with Bonsai Elasticsearch. Our fully managed Elasticsearch solution makes it easy to create, manage, and test your app's search.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope