StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Blue Ocean vs GitLab CI

Blue Ocean vs GitLab CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.6K
Votes75
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
Stacks92
Followers167
Votes7
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks537

Blue Ocean vs GitLab CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing between Blue Ocean and GitLab CI for your pipeline automation needs, it's essential to understand the key differences between these two popular tools to make an informed decision.

  1. User Interface: Blue Ocean focuses on providing a more visually appealing and user-friendly interface compared to GitLab CI. It offers a cleaner and more intuitive design, making it easier for users to navigate and understand their pipelines without compromising functionality.

  2. Integration with Jenkins and GitLab: Blue Ocean is a part of the Jenkins ecosystem and provides seamless integration with Jenkins pipelines and jobs. On the other hand, GitLab CI is tightly integrated with GitLab's repository management system, allowing for more streamlined collaboration and version control within a single platform.

  3. Configuration Complexity: GitLab CI follows a YAML-based configuration approach, which can be more complex and verbose compared to Blue Ocean's more simplified pipeline creation process. Blue Ocean offers a visual pipeline editor that allows users to create pipelines using a drag-and-drop interface, reducing the complexity of configuration.

  4. Community Support: GitLab CI has a robust and active community that provides support and contributes to the tool's development. Blue Ocean, being an official Jenkins plugin, also benefits from a large community of users and developers, ensuring continuous improvement and updates.

  5. Cost: Blue Ocean is an open-source tool that is freely available to users, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to implement pipeline automation. GitLab CI, on the other hand, is part of GitLab's paid plans, which may not be suitable for budget-conscious users or small companies.

  6. Scalability: GitLab CI is known for its scalability and ability to handle large-scale projects with thousands of pipelines. Blue Ocean, while suitable for smaller projects, may face limitations in terms of scalability and performance when dealing with complex and extensive pipelines.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Blue Ocean and GitLab CI in terms of user interface, integration, configuration complexity, community support, cost, and scalability is essential for making an informed decision when choosing a pipeline automation tool.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab CI, Blue Ocean

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 14, 2020

Decided

Buddy is one of the most easy-to-use tools for CI I ever met. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. It's literally like:

  1. Add repo
  2. Click - Click - Click
  3. You're done and your app is on prod :D The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. The support is also neat - guys respond pretty quickly on even a small issue.
157k views157k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean

GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.

Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team.

-
Sophisticated visualizations of CD pipelines, allowing for fast and intuitive comprehension of software pipeline status.;Pipeline editor (In Development) that makes automating CD pipelines approachable by guiding the user through an intuitive and visual process to create a pipeline.;Personalization of the Jenkins UI to suit the role-based needs of each member of the DevOps team.;Pinpoint precision when intervention is needed and/or issues arise. The Blue Ocean UI shows where in the pipeline attention is needed, facilitating exception handling and increasing productivity.;Native integration for branch and pull requests enables maximum developer productivity when collaborating on code with others in GitHub and Bitbucket.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
537
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
92
Followers
1.6K
Followers
167
Votes
75
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 22
    Robust CI with awesome Docker support
  • 13
    Simple configuration
  • 9
    All in one solution
  • 7
    Source Control and CI in one place
  • 5
    Free and open source
Cons
  • 2
    Works best with GitLab repositories
Pros
  • 7
    Beautiful interface
Integrations
GitLab
GitLab
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to GitLab CI, Blue Ocean?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana