Blue Ocean vs LayerCI

Overview

Blue Ocean

Stacks92

Followers167

Votes7

GitHub Stars2.9K

Forks537

LayerCI

Stacks4

Followers17

Votes0

Blue Ocean vs LayerCI: What are the differences?

Cost: Blue Ocean is a continuous integration and delivery tool that is free to use, while LayerCI offers a free tier for open-source projects but additional features require a paid subscription.
Target Audience: Blue Ocean is primarily aimed at developers and DevOps teams looking for an intuitive and user-friendly CI/CD tool, whereas LayerCI caters more towards developers who prefer running tests in isolated environments for improved reliability.
Integration: Blue Ocean integrates seamlessly with Jenkins for automated builds and deployments, whereas LayerCI operates independently as a standalone CI/CD solution, reducing the need for additional tools or platforms.
Testing Environments: Blue Ocean focuses on providing a comprehensive pipeline for testing and deployment, while LayerCI emphasizes the use of ephemeral environments for each test run to ensure a clean slate for accurate results.
Parallel Testing: Blue Ocean supports parallel testing to accelerate build times and improve overall efficiency, whereas LayerCI prioritizes isolation by running tests sequentially in individual containers to prevent interference and maintain consistency.
Community Support: Blue Ocean benefits from a large and active community for support and troubleshooting, while LayerCI offers personalized customer support and assistance for users with specific needs or challenges.

In Summary, Blue Ocean and LayerCI differ in cost, target audience, integration, testing environments, parallel testing capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Blue Ocean	LayerCI
Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team.	Turn your CI pipelines into instant demo environments per commit.We take memory snapshots of your CI pipelines to turn them into hyper-efficient lambdas & demo environments.
Sophisticated visualizations of CD pipelines, allowing for fast and intuitive comprehension of software pipeline status.;Pipeline editor (In Development) that makes automating CD pipelines approachable by guiding the user through an intuitive and visual process to create a pipeline.;Personalization of the Jenkins UI to suit the role-based needs of each member of the DevOps team.;Pinpoint precision when intervention is needed and/or issues arise. The Blue Ocean UI shows where in the pipeline attention is needed, facilitating exception handling and increasing productivity.;Native integration for branch and pull requests enables maximum developer productivity when collaborating on code with others in GitHub and Bitbucket.	Start your whole stack in seconds; Automatic demo environments; Speed without needing Docker; Get speed without unnecessary complexity; A web-based terminal for every CI pipeline; Evaluate website changes faster than ever
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 537	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 92	Stacks 4
Followers 167	Followers 17
Votes 7	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Beautiful interface	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jenkins	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Blue Ocean, LayerCI?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Blue Ocean vs LayerCI: What are the differences?

Cost: Blue Ocean is a continuous integration and delivery tool that is free to use, while LayerCI offers a free tier for open-source projects but additional features require a paid subscription.
Target Audience: Blue Ocean is primarily aimed at developers and DevOps teams looking for an intuitive and user-friendly CI/CD tool, whereas LayerCI caters more towards developers who prefer running tests in isolated environments for improved reliability.
Integration: Blue Ocean integrates seamlessly with Jenkins for automated builds and deployments, whereas LayerCI operates independently as a standalone CI/CD solution, reducing the need for additional tools or platforms.
Testing Environments: Blue Ocean focuses on providing a comprehensive pipeline for testing and deployment, while LayerCI emphasizes the use of ephemeral environments for each test run to ensure a clean slate for accurate results.
Parallel Testing: Blue Ocean supports parallel testing to accelerate build times and improve overall efficiency, whereas LayerCI prioritizes isolation by running tests sequentially in individual containers to prevent interference and maintain consistency.
Community Support: Blue Ocean benefits from a large and active community for support and troubleshooting, while LayerCI offers personalized customer support and assistance for users with specific needs or challenges.

In Summary, Blue Ocean and LayerCI differ in cost, target audience, integration, testing environments, parallel testing capabilities, and community support.

Blue Ocean vs LayerCI

Overview