StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Selenium

BrowserStack vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K

BrowserStack vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

BrowserStack and Selenium are both popular tools used for testing web applications. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will explore and highlight these differences.

  1. Deployment: BrowserStack is a cloud-based tool that allows users to perform cross-browser testing on various devices and browsers without the need for maintaining a complex infrastructure. Selenium, on the other hand, is an open-source framework that requires setting up and configuring test environments manually. This makes BrowserStack a more convenient option for teams who want to perform testing on different browser and device combinations quickly and efficiently.

  2. Browser and Device Support: BrowserStack provides an extensive range of browsers and devices for testing, including both desktop and mobile platforms. It allows testing on different versions of popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc. Selenium, being a framework, relies on browser drivers for testing. While it does support multiple browsers, the availability of drivers might be limited or may require additional effort to set up. BrowserStack offers a more comprehensive and hassle-free solution for testing across various platforms.

  3. Parallel Testing: BrowserStack allows for parallel testing, which means running tests on multiple devices and browsers simultaneously. This can significantly reduce the time required for test execution, especially when testing on a large number of browser versions and platforms. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for parallel testing. Although it is possible to implement parallel testing with Selenium using additional tools or frameworks, it requires more effort and expertise.

  4. Real Device Testing: BrowserStack provides the option to test applications on real devices. This is particularly important for testing mobile applications that require access to device-specific features like camera, GPS, or accelerometer. Selenium, being primarily a web automation tool, does not offer native support for testing on real devices. While it is possible to use Selenium with third-party tools or frameworks to test on real devices, it requires additional setup and configuration.

  5. Pricing Model: BrowserStack operates on a subscription-based pricing model. Users pay a fixed fee based on the number of parallel test sessions and the duration of the subscription. The cost increases with the number of parallel sessions and the desired access to the real device cloud. Selenium, being an open-source framework, does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, there may be additional expenses for infrastructure setup, maintenance, and integration with other tools or frameworks.

  6. Community Support: Selenium has a large and active community of developers and testers. This means that there is a wealth of online resources, forums, and community-driven support available for troubleshooting and sharing knowledge. BrowserStack, while it also has a support team and documentation available, may have a more limited community support compared to Selenium.

In summary, BrowserStack offers a cloud-based solution for cross-browser and real device testing with extensive browser and device support, parallel testing capabilities, and a subscription-based pricing model. Selenium, being an open-source framework, requires manual setup, provides support for multiple browsers but may require additional effort for different platforms, and relies on community-driven support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Selenium

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Selenium
Selenium

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
16.2K
Followers
2.0K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
533
Votes
527
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 24
    Record-Playback
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Selenium?

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana