Alternatives to Bulma

Bulma is a popular open-source CSS framework that is based on Flexbox. It offers a clean and modular design to quickly build responsive websites. Key features include a grid system, versatile components, and a mobile-first approach. However, some limitations of Bulma include limited browser support, lack of customization options, and a relatively smaller community compared to other CSS frameworks.

1. Bootstrap: Bootstrap is one of the most widely used CSS frameworks that provides a robust grid system, extensive components, and responsive designs. Pros include great documentation and a large community, while cons include a larger file size compared to Bulma.
2. Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework that allows for rapid UI development with pre-built utility classes. Key features include customizable designs and reduced reliance on custom CSS, but some may find the learning curve steep compared to Bulma.
3. Foundation: Foundation is a responsive front-end framework that offers a grid system, templates, and components for building websites. Pros include a modular codebase and customization options, while cons include a potentially steeper learning curve for beginners.
4. Materialize: Materialize is a modern responsive CSS framework based on Google's Material Design. It offers components, animations, and a grid system. Pros include a user-friendly design language, while cons may include a larger file size compared to Bulma.
5. Semantic UI: Semantic UI is a responsive front-end framework that uses human-friendly HTML for faster development. Key features include theming capabilities and a variety of UI components. Pros include a sleek design language, but cons may include a more complex syntax compared to Bulma.
6. UIKit: UIKit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework that offers a variety of components, animations, and responsive designs. Pros include a customizable and modular structure, while cons may include a smaller community compared to Bulma.
7. Spectre.css: Spectre.css is a lightweight and responsive CSS framework that focuses on modern and simple designs. Key features include a flexbox grid system and versatile components. Pros include minimalistic design aesthetics, while cons may include a potentially limited range of components compared to Bulma.
8. Chota: Chota is a lightweight and responsive CSS framework that offers a minimalistic design language and a small file size. Pros include simplicity and fast load times, but cons may include a potentially smaller feature set compared to Bulma.
9. Milligram: Milligram is a minimalist CSS framework with a small file size that focuses on providing a clean and simple design. Pros include lightweight and minimalistic design, while cons may include a potentially limited range of components compared to Bulma.
10. Bloomer: Bloomer is a flexible and lightweight CSS framework based on Bulma that offers additional utilities and components. Pros include compatibility with Bulma, while cons may include a smaller community and potentially fewer updates compared to the original Bulma framework.