Bulma vs Material UI

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Bulma

Stacks780

Followers855

Votes38

GitHub Stars50.0K

Forks3.9K

Bulma vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare the key differences between Bulma and Material UI, two popular front-end frameworks for developing websites.

Customization Options: Bulma provides a more flexible and customizable approach, allowing users to easily modify the design and appearance of components. On the other hand, Material UI follows Google's Material Design guidelines more strictly, offering a more consistent and standardized look and feel.
Component Library: Material UI offers a wide range of pre-built and styled components out of the box, making it easier for developers to quickly build websites with consistent aesthetics. Bulma, on the other hand, has a smaller component library in comparison and requires more manual styling.
Dependency Management: Bulma is a standalone CSS framework and can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. Material UI, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with React and leverages its component-based architecture, providing seamless integration with React projects.
Community Support: Material UI has a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. Bulma, while still a widely used framework, has a smaller community and may have fewer resources and support options.
Ease of Use: Bulma is designed to be lightweight and intuitive, making it easier for developers to get started quickly. Material UI has a steeper learning curve and might require more time to understand its component-oriented approach and design principles.
Theme Customization: Bulma allows users to easily customize the theme and color scheme of the entire website with just a few lines of code. Material UI also offers theme customization, but it follows the Material Design specifications more strictly, limiting certain customization options.

In summary, Bulma and Material UI differ in terms of customization options, component libraries, dependency management, community support, ease of use, and theme customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Bulma

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Bulma
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 50.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.9K
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 780
Followers 3.7K	Followers 855
Votes 445	Votes 38
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 Extra library needed for date/time pickers	Pros 12 Easy setup 6 Easy-to-customize the sass build 6 Community-created themes 5 Great docs 5 Responsive Cons 2 Not yet supporting Vue 3
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Bulma?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Bulma vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare the key differences between Bulma and Material UI, two popular front-end frameworks for developing websites.

Customization Options: Bulma provides a more flexible and customizable approach, allowing users to easily modify the design and appearance of components. On the other hand, Material UI follows Google's Material Design guidelines more strictly, offering a more consistent and standardized look and feel.
Component Library: Material UI offers a wide range of pre-built and styled components out of the box, making it easier for developers to quickly build websites with consistent aesthetics. Bulma, on the other hand, has a smaller component library in comparison and requires more manual styling.
Dependency Management: Bulma is a standalone CSS framework and can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. Material UI, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with React and leverages its component-based architecture, providing seamless integration with React projects.
Community Support: Material UI has a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. Bulma, while still a widely used framework, has a smaller community and may have fewer resources and support options.
Ease of Use: Bulma is designed to be lightweight and intuitive, making it easier for developers to get started quickly. Material UI has a steeper learning curve and might require more time to understand its component-oriented approach and design principles.
Theme Customization: Bulma allows users to easily customize the theme and color scheme of the entire website with just a few lines of code. Material UI also offers theme customization, but it follows the Material Design specifications more strictly, limiting certain customization options.

In summary, Bulma and Material UI differ in terms of customization options, component libraries, dependency management, community support, ease of use, and theme customization capabilities.