StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CloudBees vs jFrog

CloudBees vs jFrog

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudBees
CloudBees
Stacks108
Followers164
Votes6
jFrog
jFrog
Stacks131
Followers104
Votes0

CloudBees vs jFrog: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CloudBees and jFrog

CloudBees and jFrog are both leading providers in the DevOps space, offering solutions that help organizations streamline their software development and deployment processes. While both companies aim to enhance the efficiency and quality of software development, there are notable differences between CloudBees and jFrog that distinguish them from each other. Here are the key differences:

  1. Product Focus: CloudBees primarily focuses on providing a comprehensive end-to-end continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platform. Their flagship product, CloudBees CI/CD, offers a suite of features and capabilities that cover the entire software development lifecycle. On the other hand, jFrog is primarily known for its artifact repository manager, JFrog Artifactory. Although jFrog also offers other DevOps tools, its core focus remains on providing a robust artifact management solution.

  2. Integration with External Tools: CloudBees is designed to integrate seamlessly with various external tools commonly used in the DevOps ecosystem. Their platform provides native integrations with popular source code repositories, build tools, testing frameworks, and deployment platforms, among others. On the contrary, while jFrog's Artifactory can integrate with a wide range of tools, it does not provide the same level of out-of-the-box integrations that CloudBees offers.

  3. Security Capabilities: Both CloudBees and jFrog prioritize security in their offerings, but they approach it from different angles. CloudBees places significant emphasis on securing the CI/CD pipeline and ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations. They offer features such as role-based access control, secure software supply chain management, and vulnerability scanning. In contrast, jFrog focuses on securing the software artifacts themselves. Their Artifactory product provides features like access control, vulnerability scanning, and artifact signing to ensure the integrity and security of the artifacts stored in the repository.

  4. Scalability and Performance: When it comes to scalability and performance, CloudBees and jFrog offer different capabilities. CloudBees CI/CD platform is known for its ability to scale horizontally, allowing organizations to handle increasing workloads and large-scale deployments. Additionally, CloudBees provides advanced features like automated load balancing and resource allocation to optimize performance. On the other hand, jFrog Artifactory is designed to handle massive artifact repositories efficiently. It offers advanced caching and replication capabilities to ensure high availability and fast artifact retrieval.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: CloudBees has a vibrant and active community around its CI/CD platform. They have an extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations contributed by both CloudBees and community members. This broad community support provides users with access to a wide range of plugins and extensions, enhancing the functionality and versatility of the platform. While jFrog also has an active community around Artifactory, its ecosystem is not as extensive as CloudBees'. However, jFrog's repository manager does offer integration with various third-party tools and has its own set of plugins.

  6. Pricing Model: CloudBees and jFrog have different pricing models. CloudBees follows a subscription-based pricing approach, where customers pay for the number of users and features they require. Their pricing scales based on usage and the level of support needed. On the other hand, jFrog offers a usage-based pricing model, primarily based on the number of developers and the amount of data stored and transferred through their Artifactory product. This model allows organizations to tailor the cost to their specific needs.

In summary, CloudBees focuses on providing a comprehensive CI/CD platform with extensive integration capabilities, while jFrog specializes in artifact management with a robust repository manager. Both companies prioritize security and offer advanced features related to scaling, performance, and community support. The choice between CloudBees and jFrog ultimately depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CloudBees
CloudBees
jFrog
jFrog

Enables organizations to build, test and deploy applications to production, utilizing continuous delivery practices. They are focused solely on Jenkins as a tool for continuous delivery both on-premises and in the cloud.

Host, manage and proxy artifacts using the best Docker Registry, Maven Repository, Gradle repository, NuGet repository, Ruby repository, Debian repository npm repository, Yum repository.

Hosted CI/CD as a Service; Flexible and governed software delivery automation; Starter Kit; Jenkins Product Support
-
Statistics
Stacks
108
Stacks
131
Followers
164
Followers
104
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Jenkins
No community feedback yet
Integrations
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Codeship
Codeship
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Jenkins
Jenkins
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CloudBees, jFrog?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase