StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Codacy vs CodeFactor.io

Codacy vs CodeFactor.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codacy
Codacy
Stacks313
Followers551
Votes248
CodeFactor.io
CodeFactor.io
Stacks48
Followers83
Votes31

Codacy vs CodeFactor.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

Codacy and CodeFactor.io are both code analysis tools that help developers improve the quality of their code. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Pricing Model: Codacy offers a pricing model based on the number of users, repositories, and optional add-ons, allowing for more flexibility in customization. CodeFactor.io, on the other hand, has a fixed pricing structure that is solely based on the number of repositories, without considering the number of users or additional features.

  2. Integration Support: Codacy provides deeper integration with various version control systems and project management tools, including GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and Azure DevOps, enabling seamless collaboration and workflow automation. CodeFactor.io, although supporting major version control systems, has limited integration options with external tools and platforms.

  3. Supported Languages: Codacy supports a wider range of programming languages and frameworks, including popular options like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Java, which makes it suitable for diverse projects. CodeFactor.io, while supporting several languages, may have limitations when it comes to less commonly used or niche programming languages.

  4. Customizable Rules: Codacy allows developers to define their own custom rules or modify existing ones, providing greater flexibility in tailoring code analysis to their specific needs. CodeFactor.io has a predefined set of rules that cannot be modified, limiting the ability to adapt the analysis to unique project requirements.

  5. Security and Data Privacy: Codacy offers advanced security features like encrypted data storage, two-factor authentication, and SOC 2 compliance, ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of the code. CodeFactor.io also prioritizes security but does not explicitly mention specific measures like encryption or compliance certifications on its website, indicating potentially fewer security guarantees.

  6. Automation and Workflow: Codacy provides more advanced automation capabilities, such as integrations with code review tools and the ability to assign automatic code reviews to specific reviewers. CodeFactor.io, while offering basic automation features, may have less granular control over the code review process and assignment of tasks.

In summary, Codacy offers a more customizable pricing model, deeper integration support, broader language coverage, customizable rules, enhanced security features, and advanced automation capabilities compared to CodeFactor.io.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codacy
Codacy
CodeFactor.io
CodeFactor.io

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Available for cloud and self-hosted repositories;Static code analysis for +40 languages;Analysis for cloud infrastructure-as-code frameworks;Automatic analysis integrated in your CI;Code coverage tracking;Support for linter configuration files;1-click autofixes for GitHub;Static IP addresses for allowlisting Codacy;
Integrates with GitHub or BitBucket in seconds - nothing to install. Solo to Team - unlimited users for every repository. Continuously tracks code quality with every commit and pull request. Recognizes libraries in use and identifies potential code issues within. Checks complexity, duplication, churn, problems for code style, performance, etc; Provides real-time actionable feedback about potential quality issues as soon as they occur. Identifies hot-spots the most impactful list for refactoring. Private and Secure - encryption in transit and at rest. Free for Open Source and full time Students. Discount for non-profits.
Statistics
Stacks
313
Stacks
48
Followers
551
Followers
83
Votes
248
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Automated code review
  • 35
    Easy setup
  • 29
    Free for open source
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 18
    Helps reduce technical debt
Cons
  • 6
    No support for private Git or Azure DevOps git
Pros
  • 8
    Easy setup & GitHub integration
  • 7
    Github integration
  • 5
    Free for open source
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Insures that code meets quality standards
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Codacy, CodeFactor.io?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana