StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Code Climate vs RuboCop

Code Climate vs RuboCop

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Code Climate
Code Climate
Stacks740
Followers497
Votes285
RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41

Code Climate vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Code Climate and RuboCop

Code Climate and RuboCop are two popular tools used for static code analysis in Ruby. Below are the key differences between them:

1. **Purpose**: Code Climate is a cloud-based service that offers automated code review and monitoring tools to improve code quality, while RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer and formatter that focuses on enforcing the Ruby community's style guide.
  
2. **Integration**: Code Climate integrates with version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab to analyze code changes, whereas RuboCop is often integrated directly into a project's codebase as a gem and run as part of the development process.

3. **Customization**: Code Climate provides an easy-to-use dashboard for analyzing various metrics and trends in the codebase, along with the ability to customize rules and thresholds, while RuboCop offers extensive configuration options to fine-tune which rules are enforced and how they are applied.

4. **Community Support**: RuboCop has a larger and more active community contributing to its development and maintenance, resulting in regular updates and improvements, whereas Code Climate's features and updates may be more limited by its proprietary nature.

5. **Ease of Use**: Code Climate's interface is generally more user-friendly and accessible for developers of all skill levels, making it easier to get started with code analysis and improvements, while RuboCop's command-line interface and configuration settings may require more familiarity with Ruby development practices.

6. **Scalability**: Code Climate is well-suited for larger teams and projects needing centralized code quality management and reporting, whereas RuboCop's lightweight nature makes it easier to incorporate into smaller projects or individual workflows without as much overhead.

In Summary, Code Climate and RuboCop differ in their purpose, integration capabilities, customization options, community support, ease of use, and scalability, offering developers a range of choices for static code analysis in Ruby projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Code Climate, RuboCop

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments
vipul
vipul

Aug 18, 2022

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSonarQubeSonarQube

We have heavy Oracle ERP customizations in the company and some amount of Java/JSP customizations, for which the QA team has to do code review manually. For Java code review SonarQube may be good, but is it the best? And for PL/SQL, Oracle Forms/Oracle reports which tool can do Code review automation?

Please suggest.

27.6k views27.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate
Code Climate
RuboCop
RuboCop

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
-
Statistics
Stacks
740
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
497
Followers
222
Votes
285
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
Cons
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
  • 4
    Customizable
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
HipChat
HipChat
Campfire
Campfire
Semaphore
Semaphore
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, RuboCop?

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana