Code Climate vs SwiftLint

Overview

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

SwiftLint

Stacks156

Followers105

Votes0

GitHub Stars19.3K

Forks2.3K

Code Climate vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?

Integration: One key difference between Code Climate and SwiftLint is that Code Climate integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, providing real-time feedback on code quality, while SwiftLint is primarily a command-line tool for code analysis during development.
Language Support: Code Climate supports multiple languages, including Swift, Java, JavaScript, and Python, while SwiftLint is specifically tailored for Swift code analysis, providing language-specific rules and recommendations.
Customization: Code Climate offers extensive customization options through its configuration files, allowing users to define their own coding standards and rules, whereas SwiftLint has a more limited set of customizable options, focusing on enforcing best practices and common Swift coding conventions.
Reporting: Code Climate provides detailed reports and dashboards for code quality metrics, trends, and vulnerabilities, enabling teams to track their progress over time and make data-driven decisions, while SwiftLint generates simple text-based output for individual files, emphasizing quick feedback on specific code issues.
Use Cases: Code Climate is more suitable for large, complex codebases with multiple developers collaborating on a project, as it offers advanced features like duplication detection and test coverage analysis, whereas SwiftLint is more lightweight and ideal for small to medium-sized Swift projects where simplicity and speed are prioritized.
Community Support: SwiftLint benefits from a strong community of Swift developers who contribute to the project and provide plugins and extensions, enhancing its functionality and ensuring timely updates, while Code Climate relies more on its own development team for feature updates and support.

In Summary, the key differences between Code Climate and SwiftLint lie in their integration capabilities, language support, customization options, reporting features, target use cases, and level of community support for ongoing development and improvements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	SwiftLint
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	It is a tool to enforce Swift style and conventions, loosely based on GitHub's Swift Style Guide.It hooks into Clang and SourceKit to use the AST representation of your source files for more accurate results.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	automatically correct certain violations; supports nesting configuration files
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 19.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 740	Stacks 156
Followers 497	Followers 105
Votes 285	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	Xcode Jenkins macOS

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, SwiftLint?

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Code Climate vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?

Integration: One key difference between Code Climate and SwiftLint is that Code Climate integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, providing real-time feedback on code quality, while SwiftLint is primarily a command-line tool for code analysis during development.
Language Support: Code Climate supports multiple languages, including Swift, Java, JavaScript, and Python, while SwiftLint is specifically tailored for Swift code analysis, providing language-specific rules and recommendations.
Customization: Code Climate offers extensive customization options through its configuration files, allowing users to define their own coding standards and rules, whereas SwiftLint has a more limited set of customizable options, focusing on enforcing best practices and common Swift coding conventions.
Reporting: Code Climate provides detailed reports and dashboards for code quality metrics, trends, and vulnerabilities, enabling teams to track their progress over time and make data-driven decisions, while SwiftLint generates simple text-based output for individual files, emphasizing quick feedback on specific code issues.
Use Cases: Code Climate is more suitable for large, complex codebases with multiple developers collaborating on a project, as it offers advanced features like duplication detection and test coverage analysis, whereas SwiftLint is more lightweight and ideal for small to medium-sized Swift projects where simplicity and speed are prioritized.
Community Support: SwiftLint benefits from a strong community of Swift developers who contribute to the project and provide plugins and extensions, enhancing its functionality and ensuring timely updates, while Code Climate relies more on its own development team for feature updates and support.

Code Climate vs SwiftLint

Overview