StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. In Browser Testing
  5. CodeceptJS vs Ghost Inspector

CodeceptJS vs Ghost Inspector

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Stacks64
Followers117
Votes22
CodeceptJS
CodeceptJS
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes52

Ghost Inspector vs CodeceptJS: What are the differences?

Developers describe Ghost Inspector as "Catch website bugs and regressions before they cost you". It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks. On the other hand, CodeceptJS is detailed as "Modern End 2 End Testing Framework for NodeJS". It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Ghost Inspector belongs to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack, while CodeceptJS can be primarily classified under "Javascript Testing Framework".

Some of the features offered by Ghost Inspector are:

  • Automated browser testing from the cloud
  • Chrome extension for test recording
  • GUI editor for test building and editing

On the other hand, CodeceptJS provides the following key features:

  • Behavior Driven Development
  • Acceptance Testing
  • Data Driven Tests

CodeceptJS is an open source tool with 2.33K GitHub stars and 401 GitHub forks. Here's a link to CodeceptJS's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
CodeceptJS
CodeceptJS

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option
Behavior Driven Development; Acceptance Testing; Data Driven Tests
Statistics
Stacks
64
Stacks
117
Followers
117
Followers
217
Votes
22
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
Cons
  • 1
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
Pros
  • 10
    Readability
  • 9
    Cross browser support
  • 9
    Full browser control
  • 8
    Open source
  • 6
    Community
Cons
  • 2
    Small community
  • 1
    Not a framework by itself
Integrations
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Runscope
Runscope
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
JavaScript
JavaScript
SilverStripe
SilverStripe
Wallaby.js
Wallaby.js
MockIt (open source)
MockIt (open source)
Glamorous
Glamorous
Majestic GUI
Majestic GUI

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, CodeceptJS?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana