CodeHub vs GitLab

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

CodeHub

Stacks12

Followers15

Votes0

CodeHub vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CodeHub and GitLab are both popular platforms used for version control and collaboration on software projects. While they have similarities in terms of their functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart. In this comparison, we will highlight the main differences between CodeHub and GitLab.

User Interface and Design: One of the key differences between CodeHub and GitLab lies in their user interface and design. CodeHub follows a minimalist and intuitive design, making it easy for users to navigate and find the necessary features. On the other hand, GitLab offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich UI, which may be overwhelming for users who prefer a simpler interface.
Accessibility and Deployment Options: CodeHub is a cloud-based platform that is accessible via a web browser, allowing users to access their projects from anywhere with an internet connection. On the contrary, GitLab provides both cloud-based and self-hosted options, giving users more flexibility in terms of deployment, especially for organizations that require complete control over their data.
Pricing and Licensing: Another significant difference between CodeHub and GitLab is their pricing and licensing models. CodeHub offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly or yearly fee based on the number of users and features they require. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a range of pricing plans, including a free open-source version, as well as paid plans for additional features and support.
Integrated DevOps Capabilities: GitLab distinguishes itself by providing integrated DevOps capabilities within the platform. It offers features like continuous integration, continuous deployment, and container registry, allowing developers to streamline their software development lifecycle. CodeHub, although it supports some integrations, does not provide the same level of built-in DevOps capabilities as GitLab.
Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a large and active community, with numerous contributors and a vast ecosystem of integrations and extensions. This active community ensures continuous development, support, and regular updates, as well as a wealth of resources and documentation. CodeHub, although it has its own community, may not have the same level of activity and ecosystem compared to GitLab.

In summary, CodeHub and GitLab differ in terms of their user interface, accessibility options, pricing models, integrated DevOps capabilities, and community size. These differences cater to different user preferences and requirements, making it important to choose the platform that best aligns with the specific needs of a software development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, CodeHub

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	CodeHub
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	It is the best way to browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Issues & Pulls Made Easy; Notifications & Events Be Aware; Repos & Code As GitHub Intended
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 12
Followers 54.5K	Followers 15
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Atom Slack Postman

What are some alternatives to GitLab, CodeHub?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

CodeHub vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction:

User Interface and Design: One of the key differences between CodeHub and GitLab lies in their user interface and design. CodeHub follows a minimalist and intuitive design, making it easy for users to navigate and find the necessary features. On the other hand, GitLab offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich UI, which may be overwhelming for users who prefer a simpler interface.
Accessibility and Deployment Options: CodeHub is a cloud-based platform that is accessible via a web browser, allowing users to access their projects from anywhere with an internet connection. On the contrary, GitLab provides both cloud-based and self-hosted options, giving users more flexibility in terms of deployment, especially for organizations that require complete control over their data.
Pricing and Licensing: Another significant difference between CodeHub and GitLab is their pricing and licensing models. CodeHub offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly or yearly fee based on the number of users and features they require. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a range of pricing plans, including a free open-source version, as well as paid plans for additional features and support.
Integrated DevOps Capabilities: GitLab distinguishes itself by providing integrated DevOps capabilities within the platform. It offers features like continuous integration, continuous deployment, and container registry, allowing developers to streamline their software development lifecycle. CodeHub, although it supports some integrations, does not provide the same level of built-in DevOps capabilities as GitLab.
Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a large and active community, with numerous contributors and a vast ecosystem of integrations and extensions. This active community ensures continuous development, support, and regular updates, as well as a wealth of resources and documentation. CodeHub, although it has its own community, may not have the same level of activity and ecosystem compared to GitLab.

CodeHub vs GitLab

Overview