Gitolite vs CodeHub

Overview

Gitolite

Stacks38

Followers87

Votes12

GitHub Stars8.5K

Forks1.0K

CodeHub

Stacks12

Followers15

Votes0

Gitolite vs CodeHub: What are the differences?

Gitolite: Setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control. Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git; CodeHub: Browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device. It is the best way to browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device.

Gitolite and CodeHub are primarily classified as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" and "Tools for GitHub" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Gitolite are:

Use a single unix user ("real" user) on the server.
Provide access to many gitolite users: they are not "real" users, so they do not get shell access.
Control access to many git repositories: read access controlled at the repo level, and write access controlled at the branch/tag/file/directory level, including who can rewind, create, and delete branches/tags.

On the other hand, CodeHub provides the following key features:

Issues & Pulls Made Easy
Notifications & Events Be Aware
Repos & Code As GitHub Intended

Gitolite is an open source tool with 7.59K GitHub stars and 973 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Gitolite's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

GitHub

Code Collaboration

Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

137

259k

Detailed Comparison

Gitolite	CodeHub
Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.	It is the best way to browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device.
Use a single unix user ("real" user) on the server.;Provide access to many gitolite users: they are not "real" users, so they do not get shell access.;Control access to many git repositories: read access controlled at the repo level, and write access controlled at the branch/tag/file/directory level, including who can rewind, create, and delete branches/tags.;Can be installed without root access, assuming git and perl are already installed.;Authentication is most commonly done using sshd, but you can also use "smart http" mode if you prefer (this may require root access to setup).	Issues & Pulls Made Easy; Notifications & Events Be Aware; Repos & Code As GitHub Intended
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 38	Stacks 12
Followers 87	Followers 15
Votes 12	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Easy setup 4 Fine-tuned per-branch permissions 1 Really easy setup 1 Free 1 Free multi-server mirroring Cons 1 Doesn't have any user interface 1 Antiquated 1 No tools for project and issue tracker	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Atom Slack Postman

What are some alternatives to Gitolite, CodeHub?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.