StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Notifications
  4. Mobile Push Messaging
  5. CometD vs OneSignal

CometD vs OneSignal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OneSignal
OneSignal
Stacks354
Followers488
Votes127
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
CometD
CometD
Stacks22
Followers34
Votes0

CometD vs OneSignal: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between CometD and OneSignal

CometD and OneSignal are both communication platforms used for real-time messaging, but they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration: CometD is primarily used for server-to-client and client-to-client communication through the use of Comet protocols, while OneSignal is a comprehensive push notification service focused on sending notifications to mobile and web applications, making it easier to engage with users on multiple platforms.

  2. Protocol: CometD uses the Bayeux protocol for message exchange, allowing bidirectional data transfer between servers and clients, whereas OneSignal uses its proprietary RESTful API for delivering push notifications to devices, with support for platforms like iOS, Android, and web browsers.

  3. Features: CometD provides features such as real-time data streaming, presence information, and channel subscriptions, making it suitable for applications requiring continuous data updates, whereas OneSignal offers advanced functionalities like targeted notifications, A/B testing, and segmentation for personalized messaging campaigns.

  4. Scalability: CometD is designed for building scalable real-time applications and can handle high numbers of concurrent connections, making it suitable for large-scale deployments, while OneSignal is optimized for delivering notifications to a massive user base with ease, catering to the needs of diverse app developers.

  5. Authentication: CometD supports customizable authentication mechanisms for securing data exchange between servers and clients, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality, while OneSignal simplifies user authentication through its API integration, allowing developers to focus on delivering engaging content without the complexities of managing authentication processes.

  6. Customization: CometD offers greater flexibility in customizing communication protocols and data formats to meet specific application requirements, enabling developers to tailor the messaging system according to their needs, whereas OneSignal provides a user-friendly interface with pre-defined templates for creating notifications, streamlining the process of sending targeted messages to users.

In Summary, CometD and OneSignal differ in integration focus, protocols used, features offered, scalability capabilities, authentication methods, and customization options for real-time communication and push messaging services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OneSignal
OneSignal
CometD
CometD

OneSignal is a high volume push notification service for websites and mobile applications. OneSignal supports all major native and mobile platforms by providing dedicated SDKs for each platform, a RESTful server API, and a dashboard.

It is a web server to push data to a browser, without the browser explicitly requesting it. It is an umbrella term, encompassing multiple techniques for achieving this interaction.

Multiplatform notifications;Web Push Support; Safari Push Notifications;Localized message support;A/B testing;Real time analytics;Segmentation targeting;Automated marketing tools
Javascript Client; Publish/Subscribe Messaging; Service Channels; Private Message Delivery; Lazy Messages; Message Batching; Listeners, Data Filters and Extensions; Security Policy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
354
Stacks
22
Followers
488
Followers
34
Votes
127
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Free of cost
  • 22
    More parametrable
  • 17
    Simple and Easy To Use. Well Documented :)
  • 13
    Device to device
  • 12
    Simple
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Unity
Unity
Xamarin
Xamarin
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
WordPress
WordPress
Zapier
Zapier
Segment
Segment
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
Android SDK
Android SDK
iOS
iOS
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Dojo
Dojo
jQuery
jQuery

What are some alternatives to OneSignal, CometD?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase