StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Concourse vs Jenkins X

Concourse vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Concourse
Concourse
Stacks254
Followers393
Votes54
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks870
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800

Concourse vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

Concourse and Jenkins X are both popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) tools used to automate the software development and deployment process. However, there are key differences between them that make each tool unique and suited for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Concourse is designed around the concept of resources and tasks, where resources are inputs or outputs of a task. It follows a declarative approach, where pipeline configuration is defined in a YAML file. On the other hand, Jenkins X is built on top of Jenkins and Kubernetes. It utilizes GitOps principles, where all the configuration is stored in version control, and Jenkins X automatically deploys and manages the Jenkins infrastructure on Kubernetes.

  2. Scalability and Extensibility: Concourse is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large pipelines and complex workflows. It allows you to easily define and manage resources, making it suitable for large enterprises. Jenkins X, on the other hand, leverages the scalability and extensibility of Kubernetes. It provides automatic scaling of build agents and can seamlessly integrate with third-party plugins from the Jenkins ecosystem.

  3. Native Kubernetes Support: Jenkins X is specifically built for the Kubernetes ecosystem. It leverages Kubernetes pods and containers for running builds and deployments, providing native support for cloud-native applications. Concourse also has support for Kubernetes, but it treats Kubernetes as just another resource and does not have the same level of integration and automation as Jenkins X.

  4. GitOps Workflow: Jenkins X follows a GitOps workflow, where all the configuration and changes are managed through Git repositories. This allows for easy collaboration, versioning, and rollback of changes. Concourse also supports version control systems, but it does not enforce the GitOps workflow as strictly as Jenkins X.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins X has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available from the Jenkins ecosystem. This makes it easier to integrate with other tools and services commonly used in the DevOps landscape. Concourse also has a community and ecosystem, but it may not have the same breadth and depth as Jenkins X.

  6. User Interface and User Experience: Concourse has a clean and intuitive web interface for monitoring and managing pipelines. It provides detailed logs and visualizations for better visibility into the pipeline execution. Jenkins X also has a web interface, but it is built on top of Jenkins and follows a more traditional Jenkins UI, which may be more familiar to users already familiar with Jenkins.

In Summary, Concourse and Jenkins X have different architectural approaches, with Concourse focusing on declarative pipelines and resources, while Jenkins X leverages Kubernetes and follows a GitOps workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Concourse, Jenkins X

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments
veera
veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Concourse
Concourse
Jenkins X
Jenkins X

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

-
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
870
GitHub Forks
800
Stacks
254
Stacks
147
Followers
393
Followers
370
Votes
54
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to Concourse, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana