ElastAlert vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

ElastAlert

Stacks25

Followers35

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.0K

Forks1.7K

ElastAlert vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ElastAlert and Zabbix

Introduction

ElastAlert and Zabbix are two popular tools used for monitoring and alerting in IT infrastructure. While both serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between them. In this article, we will explore six major differences between ElastAlert and Zabbix.

Architecture and Integration: ElastAlert is built on top of the Elastic Stack, specifically Elasticsearch and Logstash. It integrates seamlessly with the Elastic Stack and uses Elasticsearch as its data source. On the other hand, Zabbix is a standalone monitoring system that collects data directly from various sources using agents or SNMP. It has its own database backend and does not rely on the Elastic Stack.
Flexibility and Customization: ElastAlert offers a high level of flexibility and customization. It allows users to define complex alerting rules using a YAML configuration file, which gives them fine-grained control over when and how alerts are triggered. Zabbix, while also customizable, primarily relies on predefined templates and triggers, which may limit the flexibility for more advanced use cases.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: ElastAlert may have a steeper learning curve compared to Zabbix. Configuring ElastAlert requires knowledge of Elasticsearch query language and YAML syntax. Zabbix, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly web interface and quick setup wizards, making it easier for non-technical users to get started with monitoring and alerting.
Scalability and Performance: ElastAlert's scalability depends on the performance of the underlying Elasticsearch cluster. As Elasticsearch is designed for scalable and real-time search, ElastAlert can handle large volumes of data efficiently. Zabbix, on the other hand, may face scalability challenges for extremely high data loads due to its centralized architecture and reliance on a single database backend.
Alerting Mechanism: ElastAlert offers a wide range of alerting mechanisms, including email, Slack, PagerDuty, and custom webhook integrations. It also supports aggregating alerts and sending notifications only for significant events. Zabbix, on the other hand, primarily relies on email notifications, although it also supports SNMP traps and custom scripts for alerting.
Community and Ecosystem: ElastAlert has a smaller community compared to Zabbix, which means there may be fewer resources and community-contributed plugins. Zabbix, being a more established and widely-used tool, has a larger community and a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations, making it easier to find support and extend its functionality.

In summary, ElastAlert and Zabbix differ in their architecture, flexibility, ease of use, scalability, alerting mechanisms, and community support. Choosing between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the organization or individual in terms of monitoring and alerting needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, ElastAlert

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	ElastAlert
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	A simple framework for alerting on anomalies, spikes, or other patterns of interest from data in Elasticsearch.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars 8.0K
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks 1.7K
Stacks 684	Stacks 25
Followers 981	Followers 35
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	Elasticsearch

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, ElastAlert?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

ElastAlert vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ElastAlert and Zabbix

Introduction

Architecture and Integration: ElastAlert is built on top of the Elastic Stack, specifically Elasticsearch and Logstash. It integrates seamlessly with the Elastic Stack and uses Elasticsearch as its data source. On the other hand, Zabbix is a standalone monitoring system that collects data directly from various sources using agents or SNMP. It has its own database backend and does not rely on the Elastic Stack.
Flexibility and Customization: ElastAlert offers a high level of flexibility and customization. It allows users to define complex alerting rules using a YAML configuration file, which gives them fine-grained control over when and how alerts are triggered. Zabbix, while also customizable, primarily relies on predefined templates and triggers, which may limit the flexibility for more advanced use cases.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: ElastAlert may have a steeper learning curve compared to Zabbix. Configuring ElastAlert requires knowledge of Elasticsearch query language and YAML syntax. Zabbix, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly web interface and quick setup wizards, making it easier for non-technical users to get started with monitoring and alerting.
Scalability and Performance: ElastAlert's scalability depends on the performance of the underlying Elasticsearch cluster. As Elasticsearch is designed for scalable and real-time search, ElastAlert can handle large volumes of data efficiently. Zabbix, on the other hand, may face scalability challenges for extremely high data loads due to its centralized architecture and reliance on a single database backend.
Alerting Mechanism: ElastAlert offers a wide range of alerting mechanisms, including email, Slack, PagerDuty, and custom webhook integrations. It also supports aggregating alerts and sending notifications only for significant events. Zabbix, on the other hand, primarily relies on email notifications, although it also supports SNMP traps and custom scripts for alerting.
Community and Ecosystem: ElastAlert has a smaller community compared to Zabbix, which means there may be fewer resources and community-contributed plugins. Zabbix, being a more established and widely-used tool, has a larger community and a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations, making it easier to find support and extend its functionality.

ElastAlert vs Zabbix

Overview

ElastAlert vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ElastAlert and Zabbix