Overview

Google App Engine

Stacks10.5K

Followers8.1K

Votes611

Envoyer

Stacks58

Followers80

Votes3

Envoyer vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Envoyer and Google App Engine.

Deployment Process: Envoyer simplifies the deployment process by providing a user-friendly interface and automating tasks like version control integration and server provisioning. On the other hand, Google App Engine offers a more robust and scalable deployment environment that automatically handles load balancing, scaling, and resource management without manual intervention.
Supported Languages and Frameworks: Envoyer supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it versatile for various application development needs. In contrast, Google App Engine has more restrictions on supported languages and frameworks, primarily focusing on languages like Python, Java, PHP, and Go.
Pricing Model: Envoyer operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly fee based on the selected plan and usage. In contrast, Google App Engine offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on resource usage, providing more flexibility for fluctuating traffic demands.
Scalability Options: Envoyer provides limited scalability options compared to Google App Engine, which can automatically scale resources based on demand. Google App Engine's scalability features enable applications to handle sudden traffic spikes and maintain optimal performance without manual intervention.
Training and Support: Envoyer offers documentation and support resources to assist users in getting started with the platform and troubleshooting issues. In comparison, Google App Engine provides comprehensive technical documentation, online forums, and direct support options to help users navigate the platform and resolve any challenges they encounter.

In Summary, Envoyer and Google App Engine differ in deployment process, supported languages, pricing model, scalability options, and training/support resources available.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

Daytona Platform As A Service

The open source development environment manager

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

6

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine	Envoyer
Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.	Envoyer deploys your PHP applications with zero downtime. Just push your code, and let Envoyer deliver your application to one or many servers without interrupting a single customer. In this series, we'll discuss each feature of Envoyer, demonstrating how to use them with a sample project.
Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.	GitHub / Bitbucket Integration;Seamless Deployment Rollbacks;Deploy To Multiple Servers;Easy Environment Syncing;Application Health Checks;Cron Job Monitoring;Integrated Chat Notifications;Deploy Any PHP Project;Unlimited Team Members;Unlimited Deployments;Customize Your Deployments;Tuned For Laravel
Statistics
Stacks 10.5K	Stacks 58
Followers 8.1K	Followers 80
Votes 611	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 145 Easy to deploy 106 Auto scaling 80 Good free plan 62 Easy management 56 Scalability	Pros 3 Easy to use
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces Twilio Twilio SendGrid	PHP Laravel GitHub Bitbucket HipChat Slack

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Envoyer?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.