StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. FinalBuilder vs SCons

FinalBuilder vs SCons

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FinalBuilder
FinalBuilder
Stacks10
Followers13
Votes0
SCons
SCons
Stacks8
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks338

FinalBuilder vs SCons: What are the differences?

Developers describe FinalBuilder as "Automating your Build process". With FinalBuilder you don't need to edit xml, or write scripts. Visually define and debug your build scripts, then schedule them with windows scheduler, or integrate them with Continua CI, Jenkins or any other CI Server. On the other hand, SCons is detailed as "Open Source software construction tool". It is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool. Think of it as an improved, cross-platform substitute for the classic Make utility with integrated functionality similar to autoconf/automake and compiler caches such as ccache. In short, it is an easier, more reliable and faster way to build software.

FinalBuilder belongs to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack, while SCons can be primarily classified under "Automated Build Tools".

Some of the features offered by FinalBuilder are:

  • Graphical Interface
  • Scheduled Builds
  • Flow Control

On the other hand, SCons provides the following key features:

  • Reliable, automatic dependency analysis built-in for C, C++ and Fortran
  • Use the power of a real programming language to solve build problems
  • Built-in support for fetching source files from SCCS, RCS, CVS, BitKeeper and Perforce

SCons is an open source tool with 788 GitHub stars and 169 GitHub forks. Here's a link to SCons's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FinalBuilder
FinalBuilder
SCons
SCons

With FinalBuilder you don't need to edit xml, or write scripts. Visually define and debug your build scripts, then schedule them with windows scheduler, or integrate them with Continua CI, Jenkins or any other CI Server.

It is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool. Think of it as an improved, cross-platform substitute for the classic Make utility with integrated functionality similar to autoconf/automake and compiler caches such as ccache. In short, it is an easier, more reliable and faster way to build software.

Graphical Interface; Scheduled Builds; Flow Control
Reliable, automatic dependency analysis built-in for C, C++ and Fortran; Use the power of a real programming language to solve build problems; Built-in support for fetching source files from SCCS, RCS, CVS, BitKeeper and Perforce; Reliable detection of build changes using MD5 signatures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
338
Stacks
10
Stacks
8
Followers
13
Followers
17
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    No way to undo actions in the editor
  • 1
    Hard to solve merge conflicts
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Windows
Windows
Java
Java
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
C++
C++
Qt
Qt
Perforce
Perforce
BitKeeper
BitKeeper

What are some alternatives to FinalBuilder, SCons?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana