StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Cloud Hosting
  5. FireHost vs Google Cloud Platform

FireHost vs Google Cloud Platform

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FireHost
FireHost
Stacks3
Followers6
Votes0
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Stacks26.2K
Followers14.1K
Votes18

FireHost vs Google Cloud Platform: What are the differences?

  1. Security: FireHost focuses on providing a secure hosting environment, with features such as advanced firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and security monitoring. On the other hand, Google Cloud Platform offers a wide range of security tools and services, including identity and access management, encryption at rest and in transit, and DDoS protection.

  2. Scalability: FireHost offers scalable hosting solutions, but may not be as flexible as Google Cloud Platform which allows for dynamic scaling based on workload fluctuations. Google Cloud Platform offers auto-scaling capabilities, allowing for resources to be automatically adjusted based on demand.

  3. Service Level Agreements (SLA): FireHost typically offers SLAs with uptime guarantees, but Google Cloud Platform provides more comprehensive SLAs with guarantees on performance, availability, and support response times. Google Cloud Platform's SLAs are backed by financial compensation in case of service disruptions.

  4. Support and Documentation: FireHost provides dedicated support to its customers, but the level of support may vary based on the chosen plan. In contrast, Google Cloud Platform offers extensive documentation, community support forums, and various levels of support including 24/7 support for critical issues.

  5. Cost Structure: FireHost typically offers a fixed pricing model based on the resources allocated, while Google Cloud Platform follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model where customers only pay for the resources they use. This can lead to cost savings for customers with fluctuating workloads on Google Cloud Platform.

  6. Integration with Other Services: Google Cloud Platform has a wide range of integrated services such as BigQuery, Pub/Sub, and AI Platform, allowing for seamless integration and a holistic approach to cloud computing. FireHost may not offer the same level of integration with additional services, which could limit the capabilities of the hosting environment.

In Summary, FireHost prioritizes security and dedicated support, while Google Cloud Platform offers scalability, comprehensive SLAs, extensive documentation, flexible pricing, and seamless integration with other services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on FireHost, Google Cloud Platform

Craig
Craig

Principal Consultant at Rootwork InfoTech LLC

Jul 16, 2020

Decided

We first selected Google Cloud Platform about five years ago, because HIPAA compliance was significantly cheaper and easier on Google compared to AWS. We have stayed with Google Cloud because it provides an excellent command line tool for managing resources, and every resource has a well-designed, well-documented API. SDKs for most of these APIs are available for many popular languages. I have never worked with a cloud platform that's so amenable to automation. Google is also ahead of its competitors in Kubernetes support.

200k views200k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

FireHost
FireHost
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform

FireHost offers the most comprehensive fully managed cloud infrastructure-as-a-service available today, built specifically for the needs of companies governed by PCI and HIPAA compliance regulations. Some of the largest healthcare, payments and SaaS companies in the world subscribe to FireHost’s secure cloud to ensure their data is safe and always available.

It helps you build what's next with secure infrastructure, developer tools, APIs, data analytics and machine learning. It is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.

FireHost’s HealthData Repository is a secure cloud built for HIPAA compliance that provides a safe haven for electronic healthcare records (EHR), electronic protected healthcare information (ePHI), and other sensitive data.;Payment Island is a secure, PCI-compliant cloud that isolates critical data from the rest of an IT infrastructure and applies FireHost’s unique multilayered security to prevent devastating data breaches.;FireHost’s secure cloud reduces risk by helping you protect data and exceed compliance. It is backed by FireHost’s security specialists and compliance experts. No other cloud provider has a chief security officer, chief information security officer, and a full-fledged security operations team protecting its customers in a secure cloud environment.
Scales automatically; No server management
Statistics
Stacks
3
Stacks
26.2K
Followers
6
Followers
14.1K
Votes
0
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    <a href="https://hostandprotect.com/">secure</a>
Pros
  • 5
    Good app Marketplace for Beginner and Advanced User
  • 4
    1 year free trial credit USD300
  • 3
    Cheap
  • 3
    Premium tier IP address
  • 3
    Live chat support
Integrations
No integrations available
Google App Engine
Google App Engine

What are some alternatives to FireHost, Google Cloud Platform?

DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean

We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

Amazon EC2

Amazon EC2

It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

Microsoft Azure

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

Linode

Linode

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

Scaleway

Scaleway

European cloud computing company proposing a complete & simple public cloud ecosystem, bare-metal servers & private datacenter infrastructures.

Rackspace Cloud Servers

Rackspace Cloud Servers

Cloud Servers is based on OpenStack, the open and scalable operating system for building public and private clouds. With the open cloud, you get reliable cloud hosting, without locking your data into one proprietary platform.

Gandi

Gandi

Gandi VPS Cloud Hosting offers you a flexible server with dedicated resources. The VPS virtualization is made possible by Xen technology.

WebFaction

WebFaction

No need to spend hours installing and configuring the software, database and other tools. We have over 50 one-click installers in our control panel.

Joyent Cloud

Joyent Cloud

Joyent is the high-performance cloud infrastructure company, offering the only solution specifically built to power real-time web and mobile applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase