StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Foxpass vs JSON Web Token

Foxpass vs JSON Web Token

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Foxpass
Foxpass
Stacks2
Followers11
Votes0
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374

Foxpass vs JSON Web Token: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Key differences between Foxpass and JSON Web Token.

1. **Issuance and Validation**: Foxpass issues and validates credentials internally, providing access controls based on user roles and groups. In contrast, JSON Web Tokens (JWT) are distributed by a third-party authentication server and typically verified by the resource server that receives them.
2. **Centralized Access Management**: Foxpass offers centralized access management tools for users, groups, and systems, providing a unified interface for administering access control policies. On the other hand, JSON Web Tokens do not offer centralized access management capabilities, as they are primarily used for authentication and information exchange.
3. **Expiration and Revocation**: Foxpass allows administrators to set expiration times for credentials and revoke access in real-time. In comparison, JWTs have built-in expiration timestamps but do not support real-time revocation of access.
4. **Integration Complexity**: Foxpass integration involves setting up the Foxpass agent on designated systems and configuring access policies within the Foxpass platform. Conversely, JWT integration requires establishing standards for token creation, verification, and validation, which can be more complex to implement.
5. **Scalability and Performance**: Foxpass is optimized for scaling access management across large enterprises, offering robust performance and reliability for managing user access at scale. While JWTs can be scalable due to their stateless nature, managing a large number of tokens can impact performance and response times.
6. **Security Model**: Foxpass employs a centralized security model with access controls enforced at the network level, ensuring secure authentication and authorization for users accessing resources. In contrast, the security of JWTs depends on the secure transmission and storage of the tokens, potentially exposing them to security threats if mishandled.

In Summary, Foxpass provides centralized access management, real-time revocation, and scalability advantages over JSON Web Tokens, which focus primarily on authentication and token exchange.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Foxpass
Foxpass
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

Helps technology companies improve their infrastructure security with its SaaS-based SSH-key hosting, LDAP, and RADIUS products. These services make it easy to have per-user logins to Linux machines, VPNs, and WiFi networks.

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

Full-Featured API; Cloud-Hosted LDAP & RADIUS; Logging for LDAP & RADIUS; Self-Serve SSH Key & Password Management; Local cache
compact;self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
374
Stacks
2
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
11
Followers
367
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Amazon Linux
Amazon Linux
macOS
macOS
Splunk
Splunk
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
CentOS
CentOS
Windows
Windows
Debian
Debian
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Foxpass, JSON Web Token?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope