Ghost Inspector vs Mocha

Overview

Ghost Inspector

Stacks64

Followers117

Votes22

Mocha

Stacks10.8K

Followers3.0K

Votes430

Ghost Inspector vs Mocha: What are the differences?

What is Ghost Inspector? Catch website bugs and regressions before they cost you. Ghost Inspector lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

What is Mocha? Simple, flexible, fun javascript test framework for node.js & the browser. Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Ghost Inspector and Mocha can be categorized as "Javascript Testing Framework" tools.

Some of the features offered by Ghost Inspector are:

Automated browser testing from the cloud
Chrome extension for test recording
GUI editor for test building and editing

On the other hand, Mocha provides the following key features:

browser support
simple async support, including promises
test coverage reporting

"Simple test editor" is the primary reason why developers consider Ghost Inspector over the competitors, whereas "Open source" was stated as the key factor in picking Mocha.

Mocha is an open source tool with 18.2K GitHub stars and 2.46K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Mocha's open source repository on GitHub.

Coursera, Asana, and Typeform are some of the popular companies that use Mocha, whereas Ghost Inspector is used by Binary.com, Twig World, and Vestiaire Collective. Mocha has a broader approval, being mentioned in 574 company stacks & 1521 developers stacks; compared to Ghost Inspector, which is listed in 21 company stacks and 16 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Rhesis AI Testing Frameworks

Rhesis AI

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Ghost Inspector, Mocha

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

231k views231k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector	Mocha
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.	Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option	browser support;simple async support, including promises;test coverage reporting;string diff support;javascript API for running tests;proper exit status for CI support etc;auto-detects and disables coloring for non-ttys;maps uncaught exceptions to the correct test case;async test timeout support;test-specific timeouts;growl notification support;reports test durations;highlights slow tests;file watcher support;global variable leak detection
Statistics
Stacks 64	Stacks 10.8K
Followers 117	Followers 3.0K
Votes 22	Votes 430
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Runscope integration 3 Simple test editor 3 No code required 2 Screenshot comparison 2 Videos of every test run Cons 1 Support Cross-device testing (device, web) 0 Flash Support inside browser 0 Load & Performance testing	Pros 137 Open source 102 Simple 81 Promise support 48 Flexible 29 Easy to add support for Generators Cons 3 Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion 2 No assertion count in results 1 Not as many reporter options as Jest
Integrations
PagerDuty Runscope GitHub Heroku CircleCI Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Jenkins Slack HipChat	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Mocha?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.