Overview

Ghost Inspector

Stacks64

Followers117

Votes22

WebdriverIO

Stacks426

Followers509

Votes40

GitHub Stars9.7K

Forks2.6K

Ghost Inspector vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

## Introduction

1. **Automation Tools**: Ghost Inspector is a cloud-based automated testing tool that focuses on end-to-end testing, while WebdriverIO is a test automation framework that allows for extensive browser automation and testing capabilities.
2. **Integration**: Ghost Inspector provides easy integration with popular project management and communication tools such as Slack, Trello, and Jira, allowing for seamless workflow collaborations. In contrast, WebdriverIO offers robust integration with various third-party tools and libraries to enhance test automation processes.
3. **Languages Supported**: Ghost Inspector primarily supports testing in JavaScript, whereas WebdriverIO supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Java, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred language for automation.
4. **Testing Scope**: Ghost Inspector is more suited for UI testing and end-to-end testing scenarios due to its focus on visual regression testing, whereas WebdriverIO is a versatile tool capable of handling a wide range of testing types, including unit testing, integration testing, and API testing.
5. **Community Support**: WebdriverIO has a strong community of users and contributors that actively share knowledge, resources, and plugins, making it easier for developers to find solutions and guidance for automation challenges compared to Ghost Inspector.
6. **Execution Environment**: Ghost Inspector allows testers to run tests directly in the cloud without requiring a local setup, making it convenient for distributed teams and remote testers. On the other hand, WebdriverIO supports both cloud execution and local execution, providing more flexibility in choosing the execution environment based on specific project requirements.

In Summary, Ghost Inspector and WebdriverIO differ in terms of focus on end-to-end testing, integration capabilities, language support, testing scope, community support, and execution environments.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Rhesis AI Testing Frameworks

Rhesis AI

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Ghost Inspector, WebdriverIO

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector	WebdriverIO
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.	WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option	Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.6K
Stacks 64	Stacks 426
Followers 117	Followers 509
Votes 22	Votes 40
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Runscope integration 3 No code required 3 Simple test editor 2 Screenshot comparison 2 Videos of every test run Cons 1 Support Cross-device testing (device, web) 0 Flash Support inside browser 0 Load & Performance testing	Pros 11 Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs 10 Open Source 8 Great community 7 Easy to setup 4 Best solution for broad browser support Cons 8 High maintenance
Integrations
PagerDuty Runscope GitHub Heroku CircleCI Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Jenkins Slack HipChat	Node.js Selenium

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, WebdriverIO?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.