Alternatives to Gin Gonic logo

Alternatives to Gin Gonic

Revel, Echo, Iris, Flask, and Django are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Gin Gonic.
339
339
+ 1
16

What is Gin Gonic and what are its top alternatives?

Gin Gonic is a lightweight web framework written in Go. It offers a fast HTTP router with middleware support, making it easy to build efficient web applications. Gin Gonic is known for its performance and simplicity, allowing developers to quickly set up routes and handle requests. However, some limitations of Gin Gonic include limited support for features like websockets and built-in support for data binding validation.

  1. Echo: Echo is a high-performance web framework for Go, known for its simplicity and speed. Key features include robust routing, middleware support, and a wide range of extensions. Pros: Fast and lightweight, easy to use, good for building RESTful APIs. Cons: Less feature-rich compared to other frameworks.
  2. Fiber: Fiber is an Express.js inspired web framework for Go, focusing on speed and minimalist design. It offers a fast routing engine, middleware support, and low memory consumption. Pros: High performance, easy to use, built-in support for websockets. Cons: Still relatively new with fewer resources and community support.
  3. Chi: Chi is a lightweight, composable router for Go that offers flexibility and scalability. It provides middleware chaining, robust routing, and custom handlers. Pros: Modular design, good for microservices, easy to extend. Cons: Might require more boilerplate code compared to other frameworks.
  4. Beego: Beego is a full-featured web framework for Go that includes a powerful ORM, built-in tools, and MVC architecture. It offers auto-generated API documents, session management, and internationalization support. Pros: Rapid development, rich ecosystem, good for large-scale projects. Cons: Can be bulky for small projects, steep learning curve for beginners.
  5. Buffalo: Buffalo is a web development eco-system for Go, providing a set of tools and libraries for building modern web applications. It includes a code generator, hot reloading, testing utilities, and asset pipeline management. Pros: Batteries-included approach, reduces boilerplate code, strong community support. Cons: Opinionated framework, might not suit every project's needs.
  6. Gorilla: Gorilla is a web toolkit for Go, offering packages for various tasks like sessions, websockets, and secure cookies. It provides flexibility and extensibility for building web applications. Pros: Modular design, well-documented, good for specialized use cases. Cons: Might require integrating multiple packages, learning curve for beginners.
  7. Revel: Revel is a full-stack web framework for Go, focusing on high productivity and ease of use. It includes features like hot code reloading, request routing, and automatic validation. Pros: Fast development, follows MVC pattern, supports testing out of the box. Cons: Opinionated design, might limit flexibility for certain projects.
  8. Iris: Iris is a feature-rich web framework for Go that emphasizes performance and scalability. It offers a fast router, middleware support, dependency injection, and built-in tools for caching and authentication. Pros: High performance, comprehensive documentation, good for building complex applications. Cons: Steeper learning curve, not as beginner-friendly as other frameworks.
  9. Revel: This is an autonomous and fast Go web framework for building lightweight webapp, microservices etc.
  10. Meego: Meego is a recent Go web framework known for its super lightweight. It is suitable for small applications with simple requirements.

Top Alternatives to Gin Gonic

  • Revel
    Revel

    Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle. ...

  • Echo
    Echo

    It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang). ...

  • Iris
    Iris

    The fastest web framework for Go.

  • Flask
    Flask

    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind. ...

  • Django
    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

Gin Gonic alternatives & related posts

Revel logo

Revel

36
38
A high productivity, full-stack web framework for the Go language
36
38
PROS OF REVEL
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Simple
CONS OF REVEL
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Revel posts

    Echo logo

    Echo

    303
    59
    High performance, extensible, minimalist Go web framework
    303
    59
    PROS OF ECHO
    • 11
      Easy to use
    • 10
      Highly customizable
    • 10
      Performance
    • 9
      Open source
    • 9
      Lightweight
    • 7
      Middleware
    • 3
      Minimal
    CONS OF ECHO
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Echo posts

      Iris logo

      Iris

      83
      16
      The fastest web framework for Go in (THIS) earth
      83
      16
      PROS OF IRIS
      • 6
        Fast
      • 4
        Easy to use
      • 3
        Almost real-time support to its users
      • 2
        Fluent API
      • 1
        MVC efficient
      CONS OF IRIS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Iris posts

        Flask logo

        Flask

        19.2K
        60
        A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
        19.2K
        60
        PROS OF FLASK
        • 10
          For it flexibility
        • 9
          Flexibilty and easy to use
        • 7
          User friendly
        • 6
          Secured
        • 5
          Unopinionated
        • 2
          Secure
        • 2
          Customizable
        • 1
          Simple to use
        • 1
          Powerful
        • 1
          Rapid development
        • 1
          Flask
        • 1
          Easy to get started
        • 1
          Easy to develop and maintain applications
        • 1
          Easy to setup and get it going
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Documentation
        • 1
          Beautiful code
        • 1
          Orm
        • 1
          Not JS
        • 1
          Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
        • 1
          Easy to integrate
        • 1
          Speed
        • 1
          Get started quickly
        • 1
          Python
        • 1
          Minimal
        • 1
          Lightweight
        • 0
          Flexibilty
        • 0
          Well designed
        • 0
          Productive
        • 0
          Awesome
        • 0
          Open source
        • 0
          Expressive
        • 0
          Love it
        CONS OF FLASK
        • 10
          Not JS
        • 7
          Context
        • 5
          Not fast
        • 1
          Don't has many module as in spring

        related Flask posts

        James Man
        Software Engineer at Pinterest · | 47 upvotes · 3M views
        Shared insights
        on
        FlaskFlaskReactReact
        at

        One of our top priorities at Pinterest is fostering a safe and trustworthy experience for all Pinners. As Pinterest’s user base and ads business grow, the review volume has been increasing exponentially, and more content types require moderation support. To solve greater engineering and operational challenges at scale, we needed a highly-reliable and performant system to detect, report, evaluate, and act on abusive content and users and so we created Pinqueue.

        Pinqueue-3.0 serves as a generic platform for content moderation and human labeling. Under the hood, Pinqueue3.0 is a Flask + React app powered by Pinterest’s very own Gestalt UI framework. On the backend, Pinqueue3.0 heavily relies on PinLater, a Pinterest-built reliable asynchronous job execution system, to handle the requests for enqueueing and action-taking. Using PinLater has significantly strengthened Pinqueue3.0’s overall infra with its capability of processing a massive load of events with configurable retry policies.

        Hundreds of millions of people around the world use Pinterest to discover and do what they love, and our job is to protect them from abusive and harmful content. We’re committed to providing an inspirational yet safe experience to all Pinners. Solving trust & safety problems is a joint effort requiring expertise across multiple domains. Pinqueue3.0 not only plays a critical role in responsively taking down unsafe content, it also has become an enabler for future ML/automation initiatives by providing high-quality human labels. Going forward, we will continue to improve the review experience, measure review quality and collaborate with our machine learning teams to solve content moderation beyond manual reviews at an even larger scale.

        See more

        Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

        See more
        Django logo

        Django

        38.5K
        4.2K
        The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
        38.5K
        4.2K
        PROS OF DJANGO
        • 675
          Rapid development
        • 488
          Open source
        • 426
          Great community
        • 380
          Easy to learn
        • 277
          Mvc
        • 232
          Beautiful code
        • 223
          Elegant
        • 208
          Free
        • 203
          Great packages
        • 194
          Great libraries
        • 80
          Comes with auth and crud admin panel
        • 79
          Restful
        • 78
          Powerful
        • 76
          Great documentation
        • 72
          Great for web
        • 57
          Python
        • 43
          Great orm
        • 41
          Great for api
        • 32
          All included
        • 29
          Fast
        • 25
          Web Apps
        • 23
          Clean
        • 23
          Easy setup
        • 21
          Used by top startups
        • 19
          Sexy
        • 19
          ORM
        • 15
          The Django community
        • 14
          Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
        • 14
          Convention over configuration
        • 11
          King of backend world
        • 10
          Full stack
        • 10
          Great MVC and templating engine
        • 8
          Mvt
        • 8
          Fast prototyping
        • 7
          Its elegant and practical
        • 7
          Easy to develop end to end AI Models
        • 7
          Batteries included
        • 6
          Cross-Platform
        • 6
          Very quick to get something up and running
        • 6
          Have not found anything that it can't do
        • 5
          Zero code burden to change databases
        • 5
          Great peformance
        • 5
          Python community
        • 5
          Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
        • 4
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Map
        • 4
          Easy to change database manager
        • 4
          Full-Text Search
        • 4
          Just the right level of abstraction
        • 4
          Many libraries
        • 4
          Modular
        • 4
          Easy
        • 3
          Scaffold
        • 1
          Node js
        • 1
          Built in common security
        • 1
          Great default admin panel
        • 1
          Scalable
        • 1
          Gigante ta
        • 1
          Cons
        • 1
          Fastapi
        • 0
          Rails
        CONS OF DJANGO
        • 26
          Underpowered templating
        • 22
          Autoreload restarts whole server
        • 22
          Underpowered ORM
        • 15
          URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
        • 10
          Internal subcomponents coupling
        • 8
          Not nodejs
        • 8
          Configuration hell
        • 7
          Admin
        • 5
          Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
        • 4
          Python
        • 3
          Not typed
        • 3
          Bloated admin panel included
        • 2
          Overwhelming folder structure
        • 2
          InEffective Multithreading
        • 1
          Not type safe

        related Django posts

        Shared insights
        on
        TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

        Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

        It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

        I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

        What do you think about TensorFlow?

        Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

        See more
        Dmitry Mukhin
        Engineer at Uploadcare · | 25 upvotes · 2.6M views

        Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

        Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

        For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

        However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

        All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

        See more
        JavaScript logo

        JavaScript

        371.1K
        8.1K
        Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
        371.1K
        8.1K
        PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
        • 1.7K
          Can be used on frontend/backend
        • 1.5K
          It's everywhere
        • 1.2K
          Lots of great frameworks
        • 899
          Fast
        • 746
          Light weight
        • 425
          Flexible
        • 392
          You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
        • 286
          Non-blocking i/o
        • 237
          Ubiquitousness
        • 191
          Expressive
        • 55
          Extended functionality to web pages
        • 49
          Relatively easy language
        • 46
          Executed on the client side
        • 30
          Relatively fast to the end user
        • 25
          Pure Javascript
        • 21
          Functional programming
        • 15
          Async
        • 13
          Full-stack
        • 12
          Its everywhere
        • 12
          Future Language of The Web
        • 12
          Setup is easy
        • 11
          JavaScript is the New PHP
        • 11
          Because I love functions
        • 10
          Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
        • 9
          Everyone use it
        • 9
          Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
        • 9
          Easy
        • 9
          Expansive community
        • 8
          For the good parts
        • 8
          Easy to hire developers
        • 8
          No need to use PHP
        • 8
          Most Popular Language in the World
        • 8
          Powerful
        • 8
          Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
        • 7
          It's fun
        • 7
          Its fun and fast
        • 7
          Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
        • 7
          Agile, packages simple to use
        • 7
          Supports lambdas and closures
        • 7
          Love-hate relationship
        • 7
          Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
        • 7
          Evolution of C
        • 7
          Hard not to use
        • 7
          Versitile
        • 7
          Nice
        • 6
          Easy to make something
        • 6
          Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
        • 6
          1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
        • 6
          Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
        • 6
          It let's me use Babel & Typescript
        • 5
          Clojurescript
        • 5
          Everywhere
        • 5
          Scope manipulation
        • 5
          Function expressions are useful for callbacks
        • 5
          Stockholm Syndrome
        • 5
          Promise relationship
        • 5
          Client processing
        • 5
          What to add
        • 4
          Because it is so simple and lightweight
        • 4
          Only Programming language on browser
        • 1
          Subskill #4
        • 1
          Test2
        • 1
          Easy to understand
        • 1
          Not the best
        • 1
          Easy to learn
        • 1
          Hard to learn
        • 1
          Easy to learn and test
        • 1
          Love it
        • 1
          Test
        • 0
          Hard 彤
        CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
        • 22
          A constant moving target, too much churn
        • 20
          Horribly inconsistent
        • 15
          Javascript is the New PHP
        • 9
          No ability to monitor memory utilitization
        • 8
          Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
        • 7
          Thinks strange results are better than errors
        • 6
          Can be ugly
        • 3
          No GitHub
        • 2
          Slow
        • 0
          HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

        related JavaScript posts

        Zach Holman

        Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

        But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

        But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

        Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

        See more
        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Python logo

        Python

        250.3K
        6.9K
        A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
        250.3K
        6.9K
        PROS OF PYTHON
        • 1.2K
          Great libraries
        • 965
          Readable code
        • 848
          Beautiful code
        • 789
          Rapid development
        • 692
          Large community
        • 439
          Open source
        • 394
          Elegant
        • 283
          Great community
        • 274
          Object oriented
        • 222
          Dynamic typing
        • 78
          Great standard library
        • 62
          Very fast
        • 56
          Functional programming
        • 52
          Easy to learn
        • 47
          Scientific computing
        • 36
          Great documentation
        • 30
          Productivity
        • 29
          Matlab alternative
        • 29
          Easy to read
        • 25
          Simple is better than complex
        • 21
          It's the way I think
        • 20
          Imperative
        • 19
          Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
        • 19
          Free
        • 17
          Powerfull language
        • 17
          Machine learning support
        • 16
          Fast and simple
        • 14
          Scripting
        • 12
          Explicit is better than implicit
        • 11
          Ease of development
        • 10
          Clear and easy and powerfull
        • 9
          Unlimited power
        • 8
          It's lean and fun to code
        • 8
          Import antigravity
        • 7
          Print "life is short, use python"
        • 7
          Python has great libraries for data processing
        • 6
          Although practicality beats purity
        • 6
          Fast coding and good for competitions
        • 6
          There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
        • 6
          High Documented language
        • 6
          Readability counts
        • 6
          Rapid Prototyping
        • 6
          I love snakes
        • 6
          Now is better than never
        • 6
          Flat is better than nested
        • 6
          Great for tooling
        • 5
          Great for analytics
        • 5
          Web scraping
        • 5
          Lists, tuples, dictionaries
        • 4
          Complex is better than complicated
        • 4
          Socially engaged community
        • 4
          Plotting
        • 4
          Beautiful is better than ugly
        • 4
          Easy to learn and use
        • 4
          Easy to setup and run smooth
        • 4
          Simple and easy to learn
        • 4
          Multiple Inheritence
        • 4
          CG industry needs
        • 3
          List comprehensions
        • 3
          Powerful language for AI
        • 3
          Flexible and easy
        • 3
          It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
        • 3
          Many types of collections
        • 3
          If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
        • 3
          If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
        • 3
          Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
        • 3
          Pip install everything
        • 3
          No cruft
        • 3
          Generators
        • 3
          Import this
        • 2
          Can understand easily who are new to programming
        • 2
          Securit
        • 2
          Should START with this but not STICK with This
        • 2
          A-to-Z
        • 2
          Because of Netflix
        • 2
          Only one way to do it
        • 2
          Better outcome
        • 2
          Good for hacking
        • 2
          Batteries included
        • 2
          Procedural programming
        • 1
          Sexy af
        • 1
          Automation friendly
        • 1
          Slow
        • 1
          Best friend for NLP
        • 0
          Powerful
        • 0
          Keep it simple
        • 0
          Ni
        CONS OF PYTHON
        • 53
          Still divided between python 2 and python 3
        • 28
          Performance impact
        • 26
          Poor syntax for anonymous functions
        • 22
          GIL
        • 19
          Package management is a mess
        • 14
          Too imperative-oriented
        • 12
          Hard to understand
        • 12
          Dynamic typing
        • 12
          Very slow
        • 8
          Indentations matter a lot
        • 8
          Not everything is expression
        • 7
          Incredibly slow
        • 7
          Explicit self parameter in methods
        • 6
          Requires C functions for dynamic modules
        • 6
          Poor DSL capabilities
        • 6
          No anonymous functions
        • 5
          Fake object-oriented programming
        • 5
          Threading
        • 5
          The "lisp style" whitespaces
        • 5
          Official documentation is unclear.
        • 5
          Hard to obfuscate
        • 5
          Circular import
        • 4
          Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
        • 4
          The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
        • 4
          Not suitable for autocomplete
        • 2
          Meta classes
        • 1
          Training wheels (forced indentation)

        related Python posts

        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

        Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

        It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

        I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

        What do you think about TensorFlow?

        Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

        See more
        Node.js logo

        Node.js

        193K
        8.5K
        A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
        193K
        8.5K
        PROS OF NODE.JS
        • 1.4K
          Npm
        • 1.3K
          Javascript
        • 1.1K
          Great libraries
        • 1K
          High-performance
        • 805
          Open source
        • 487
          Great for apis
        • 477
          Asynchronous
        • 425
          Great community
        • 390
          Great for realtime apps
        • 296
          Great for command line utilities
        • 86
          Websockets
        • 84
          Node Modules
        • 69
          Uber Simple
        • 59
          Great modularity
        • 58
          Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
        • 42
          Easy to start
        • 35
          Great for Data Streaming
        • 32
          Realtime
        • 28
          Awesome
        • 25
          Non blocking IO
        • 18
          Can be used as a proxy
        • 17
          High performance, open source, scalable
        • 16
          Non-blocking and modular
        • 15
          Easy and Fun
        • 14
          Easy and powerful
        • 13
          Future of BackEnd
        • 13
          Same lang as AngularJS
        • 12
          Fullstack
        • 11
          Fast
        • 10
          Scalability
        • 10
          Cross platform
        • 9
          Simple
        • 8
          Mean Stack
        • 7
          Great for webapps
        • 7
          Easy concurrency
        • 6
          Typescript
        • 6
          Fast, simple code and async
        • 6
          React
        • 6
          Friendly
        • 5
          Control everything
        • 5
          Its amazingly fast and scalable
        • 5
          Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
        • 5
          Scalable
        • 5
          Great speed
        • 5
          Fast development
        • 4
          It's fast
        • 4
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Isomorphic coolness
        • 3
          Great community
        • 3
          Not Python
        • 3
          Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
        • 3
          TypeScript Support
        • 3
          Blazing fast
        • 3
          Performant and fast prototyping
        • 3
          Easy to learn
        • 3
          Easy
        • 3
          Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
        • 3
          One language, end-to-end
        • 3
          Less boilerplate code
        • 2
          Npm i ape-updating
        • 2
          Event Driven
        • 2
          Lovely
        • 1
          Creat for apis
        • 0
          Node
        CONS OF NODE.JS
        • 46
          Bound to a single CPU
        • 45
          New framework every day
        • 40
          Lots of terrible examples on the internet
        • 33
          Asynchronous programming is the worst
        • 24
          Callback
        • 19
          Javascript
        • 11
          Dependency hell
        • 11
          Dependency based on GitHub
        • 10
          Low computational power
        • 7
          Very very Slow
        • 7
          Can block whole server easily
        • 7
          Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
        • 4
          Breaking updates
        • 4
          Unstable
        • 3
          Unneeded over complication
        • 3
          No standard approach
        • 1
          Bad transitive dependency management
        • 1
          Can't read server session

        related Node.js posts

        Anurag Maurya

        Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

        Hello community,

        I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

        I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

        Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

        I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

        For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

        1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

        2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

        3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

        See more