Github Actions vs Snap CI

Overview

Snap CI

Stacks29

Followers56

Votes100

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Github Actions vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Integration with platforms: Github Actions integrates seamlessly with GitHub repositories, enabling automated workflows directly connected to version-controlled code, whereas Snap CI is a standalone tool that requires separate setup and configuration for integrating with version control systems.
Pricing Model: Github Actions offers a pay-per-minute pricing model, providing more cost efficiency for small to medium-scale projects, while Snap CI follows a tiered pricing model based on the number of pipelines and agents, which may result in higher costs for projects with extensive automation needs.
Community support: Github Actions benefits from a large and active community of users constantly contributing new features, plugins, and workflows, enhancing its flexibility and extensibility, whereas Snap CI has a smaller community base, resulting in limited third-party integrations and customization options.
Execution Environment: Github Actions runs on GitHub's infrastructure, providing scalability and reliability in executing workflows, whereas Snap CI requires users to set up and manage their own infrastructure, which can be a potential overhead in terms of maintenance and resource allocation.
User Interface: Github Actions offers a user-friendly web interface for setting up and monitoring workflows, with intuitive visualizations and logs, while Snap CI provides a simpler interface that may lack the same level of graphical representation and ease of use for beginners.
Triggering Mechanisms: Github Actions allows for a variety of triggers such as push, pull requests, schedules, and webhooks, providing more granular control over workflow execution, whereas Snap CI primarily relies on basic trigger mechanisms like commit events, potentially limiting the flexibility in automation scenarios requiring more complex triggers.

In Summary, Github Actions excels in integration with platforms, pricing model, community support, execution environment, user interface, and triggering mechanisms compared to Snap CI.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Snap CI, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snap CI	GitHub Actions
Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Deployment Options - Heroku, AWS;System Libraries - Your build runs on a RedHat 6-compatible system with commonly required libraries;Customization Options - In addition to all that we support out of the box, we offer you the chance to customize your build extensively.;Multi-Stage Deployment Pipelines	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 29	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 56	Followers 3.1K
Votes 100	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Github integration 13 Easy setup 11 Multi-stage pipelines 10 Continuous deployment 9 Great customer support	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Configs stored in .github Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
Docker Slack Amazon EC2 GitHub Heroku	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Snap CI, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Github Actions vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Integration with platforms: Github Actions integrates seamlessly with GitHub repositories, enabling automated workflows directly connected to version-controlled code, whereas Snap CI is a standalone tool that requires separate setup and configuration for integrating with version control systems.
Pricing Model: Github Actions offers a pay-per-minute pricing model, providing more cost efficiency for small to medium-scale projects, while Snap CI follows a tiered pricing model based on the number of pipelines and agents, which may result in higher costs for projects with extensive automation needs.
Community support: Github Actions benefits from a large and active community of users constantly contributing new features, plugins, and workflows, enhancing its flexibility and extensibility, whereas Snap CI has a smaller community base, resulting in limited third-party integrations and customization options.
Execution Environment: Github Actions runs on GitHub's infrastructure, providing scalability and reliability in executing workflows, whereas Snap CI requires users to set up and manage their own infrastructure, which can be a potential overhead in terms of maintenance and resource allocation.
User Interface: Github Actions offers a user-friendly web interface for setting up and monitoring workflows, with intuitive visualizations and logs, while Snap CI provides a simpler interface that may lack the same level of graphical representation and ease of use for beginners.
Triggering Mechanisms: Github Actions allows for a variety of triggers such as push, pull requests, schedules, and webhooks, providing more granular control over workflow execution, whereas Snap CI primarily relies on basic trigger mechanisms like commit events, potentially limiting the flexibility in automation scenarios requiring more complex triggers.

In Summary, Github Actions excels in integration with platforms, pricing model, community support, execution environment, user interface, and triggering mechanisms compared to Snap CI.

Github Actions vs Snap CI

Overview