StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gogs vs OneDev

Gogs vs OneDev

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gogs
Gogs
Stacks175
Followers306
Votes182
OneDev
OneDev
Stacks8
Followers30
Votes3
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks920

Gogs vs OneDev: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gogs and OneDev are both self-hosted Git platforms that provide the ability to manage and collaborate on code repositories. While they share similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Installation and Configuration: Gogs requires manual installation and configuration, making it more suitable for advanced users who prefer to have full control over the setup process. On the other hand, OneDev offers a user-friendly installation process with automated configuration, making it more accessible to a wider range of users, including beginners.

  2. User Interface: Gogs provides a simple and minimalistic user interface, focusing on functionality rather than visual aesthetics. In contrast, OneDev offers a more modern and visually appealing interface with additional features like drag-and-drop support for file uploads and a customizable dashboard.

  3. Collaboration Features: Gogs offers basic collaboration features such as pull requests, issues, and code reviews. While OneDev also provides these features, it goes a step further by offering built-in continuous integration and deployment capabilities, allowing developers to automate their software delivery process without the need for external tools.

  4. Extensibility and Customization: Gogs provides a limited set of plugins and customization options, which may make it less suitable for users who require specific functionalities or want to modify the platform extensively. OneDev, on the other hand, offers a wide range of plugins and customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs.

  5. Community and Support: Gogs has a relatively smaller community compared to OneDev, which may result in fewer resources and community-driven plugins and extensions. OneDev has a larger community and active support, making it easier for users to find assistance and leverage the collective knowledge of the community.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Gogs is released under the MIT License, making it open-source and free to use. OneDev also has an open-source edition, but it also offers a commercial edition with additional enterprise features and support, making it suitable for organizations with specific requirements.

In summary, Gogs is a self-hosted Git platform with manual installation and a simple user interface, while OneDev offers a user-friendly installation process, a visually appealing interface, additional collaboration features, extensive customization options, a larger community, and a commercial edition for enterprise use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gogs
Gogs
OneDev
OneDev

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

It is a super easy all-in-one DevOps platform. With Issue Tracking, Git Management, Pull Request, and Build Farm. Simple yet Powerful.

Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Docker First Kubernetes Native Build Farm; Create Build Spec in a Breeze; Flexible Build Workflow and Pipeline; Custom Issue States and Fields; Auto-Refreshing Issue Boards; Symbol Search and Navigation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
920
Stacks
175
Stacks
8
Followers
306
Followers
30
Votes
182
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Self-hosted github like service
  • 31
    Very low memory footprint
  • 29
    Easy to install / update
  • 17
    Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi
  • 16
    Single binary deploy no dependencies
Pros
  • 1
    Integrated CI/CD
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Self-hosted
Integrations
No integrations available
C++
C++
Java
Java
Less
Less
JavaScript
JavaScript
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
C#
C#
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Gogs, OneDev?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana