StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Google Cloud Container Builder vs Helios

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Helios

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Helios
Helios
Stacks21
Followers74
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks233
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
Stacks177
Followers198
Votes0

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Helios: What are the differences?

  1. Pricing Structure: Google Cloud Container Builder offers pay-as-you-go pricing based on the resources used, while Helios follows a subscription-based pricing model which may be more cost-effective for long-term usage.
  2. Integration with Platforms: Google Cloud Container Builder seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, providing a cohesive cloud computing environment, whereas Helios offers more flexibility by supporting various platforms including AWS, GCP, and on-premises deployments.
  3. Supported Languages: Google Cloud Container Builder supports a limited set of programming languages, primarily focused on mainstream languages like Python, Java, and Node.js, whereas Helios has a broader language support, accommodating languages like Go, Ruby, and PHP as well.
  4. Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Capabilities: Google Cloud Container Builder offers native CI/CD workflows within the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem, allowing for streamlined development processes, while Helios requires third-party tools for integrating CI/CD pipelines into the workflow.
  5. Scalability: Google Cloud Container Builder has built-in capabilities for auto-scaling based on workload demands, ensuring efficient resource utilization, whereas Helios may require manual scaling configurations for handling fluctuations in workload.

In Summary, Google Cloud Container Builder offers seamless integration within the Google Cloud environment with pay-as-you-go pricing, while Helios provides broader platform support and language compatibility with a subscription-based pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Helios
Helios
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder

Helios is a Docker orchestration platform for deploying and managing containers across an entire fleet of servers. Helios provides a HTTP API as well as a command-line client to interact with servers running your containers.

Run your container image builds in a fast, consistent, and reliable environment on Google Cloud Platform. Build in any language and package your build artifacts into Docker containers for deployment.

Helios is pragmatic.; Helios fits into the way you already do ops.;Hihgly scalable
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
233
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21
Stacks
177
Followers
74
Followers
198
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Helios, Google Cloud Container Builder?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana