StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Google Cloud Source Repositories vs Upsource

Google Cloud Source Repositories vs Upsource

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Upsource
Upsource
Stacks51
Followers77
Votes58
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Stacks91
Followers160
Votes0

Google Cloud Source Repositories vs Upsource: What are the differences?

<Google Cloud Source Repositories and Upsource are both popular tools for managing source code in a collaborative environment. However, they have key differences that make each suitable for different needs.>

  1. Hosting and Integration: Google Cloud Source Repositories is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform services, offering seamless collaboration for users already integrated into the GCP ecosystem. On the other hand, Upsource is a standalone code review tool that works with various version control systems, providing more flexibility in hosting options.

  2. Code Review Capabilities: Google Cloud Source Repositories offers basic code review features integrated with the Git workflows, but lacks advanced code review tools. Conversely, Upsource is specifically designed for in-depth code review, providing features like code intelligence, discussions, and detailed analyzation of changes, enhancing code quality.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Google Cloud Source Repositories is hosted on Google Cloud Platform, providing scalable and reliable infrastructure. Upsource, being a standalone tool, requires set up and maintenance, possibly limiting scalability based on the server setup and resources allocated.

  4. Security and Compliance: Google Cloud Source Repositories follows Google's stringent security standards, ensuring data safety and compliance. Upsource also provides robust security features, but organizations with specific compliance requirements might find Google Cloud Source Repositories more suitable due to Google's compliance certifications.

  5. Integration with IDEs: Google Cloud Source Repositories offers integrations with popular IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and Visual Studio, allowing for a smoother development experience. Upsource, while not as tightly integrated with IDEs, provides plugins for major IDEs to facilitate code review and collaboration within the development environment.

  6. Cost and Licensing: Google Cloud Source Repositories is included in Google Cloud Platform pricing, making it cost-effective for users already utilizing GCP services. Upsource, being a standalone tool, requires a separate licensing cost, which can vary based on the number of users and features needed.

In Summary, Google Cloud Source Repositories is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform, providing seamless collaboration and scalable infrastructure, while Upsource excels in advanced code review capabilities and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Upsource
Upsource
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Collaborate easily and securely manage your code on a fully featured, scalable, private Git repository. Extend your Git workflow by connecting to other GCP tools, including Cloud Build, App Engine, Stackdriver, and Cloud Pub/Sub. Get access to fast, indexed powerful code search across all your owned repositories to save time.

Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code
Unlimited private Git repositories;Deploy directly from Cloud Source Repositories;Automatically build and test your source code;Versioning and aliasing for serverless requests;Debug in production;Detailed audit logs;
Statistics
Stacks
51
Stacks
91
Followers
77
Followers
160
Votes
58
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Free for 10 users
  • 12
    Good code review
  • 8
    Java code inspections and navigation
  • 8
    IDE integration
  • 3
    Has a linux version
Cons
  • 3
    Very Large Server Footprint. Very large
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce
Git
Git
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Upsource, Google Cloud Source Repositories?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana