Grav vs Orchard CMS: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Grav and Orchard CMS:

1. **Architecture**: Grav CMS is file-based, meaning content is stored in files on the filesystem, making it easier to version control and manage. On the other hand, Orchard CMS is database-driven, storing content in a database which offers more robust features for complex websites.
   
2. **Development Approach**: Grav focuses on simplicity and speed, using a flat-file structure that allows for quick setup and lightweight performance. Orchard, being a .NET framework, caters more to developers looking for extensive customization and integration options with Microsoft technologies.

3. **Community and Support**: Grav has a smaller community compared to Orchard, resulting in less third-party plugins and themes but a more tightly-knit support network. Orchard, backed by Microsoft, has a larger community support system and more extensive documentation available.

4. **Learning Curve**: Grav is known for its user-friendly interface and minimal learning curve, making it ideal for beginners and smaller projects. Orchard, being more comprehensive and flexible, requires a steeper learning curve and is better suited for experienced developers.

5. **Deployment and Scalability**: Grav's file-based nature makes it easier to deploy and scale on various hosting platforms, while Orchard's database-driven approach may require more resources and careful implementation for scalability.

6. **Customization and Extensibility**: Grav provides a lightweight, flexible core with the ability to extend features through plugins and themes. Orchard, with its modular architecture, offers extensive customization options but may require more development expertise to leverage its full potential.

In Summary, Grav and Orchard CMS differ in their architecture, development approach, community support, learning curve, deployment scalability, and customization options.