Overview

Hudson

Stacks12

Followers18

Votes0

Jenkins X

Stacks147

Followers370

Votes16

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks800

Hudson vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

Hudson and Jenkins X are both popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) tools used in software development to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.

Architecture: Hudson is a monolithic CI/CD tool where all the features and functionalities are bundled together in a single application. On the other hand, Jenkins X follows a microservices architecture, where different components are separated into individual services, allowing for modular and scalable deployments.
Kubernetes-Native Approach: Jenkins X is designed to work seamlessly with Kubernetes out of the box, providing a native and streamlined experience for deploying applications on Kubernetes clusters. Hudson, on the other hand, lacks native integration with Kubernetes and may require additional plugins or configurations to work with Kubernetes environments.
GitOps Workflow: Jenkins X promotes a GitOps workflow by leveraging Git as the source of truth for deployment and configuration management. It uses Git repositories to store the application code, configuration files, and deployment manifests, making it easier to track changes, collaborate, and roll back deployments. Hudson does not have native support for GitOps workflows and may require additional tools or setups to achieve similar capabilities.
Built-in Support for Cloud-Native Technologies: Jenkins X incorporates various cloud-native technologies, such as Helm charts, Kubernetes Operators, and Serverless Framework, to simplify the deployment and management of applications in modern cloud environments. Hudson, being an older technology, may not have the same level of built-in support for these cloud-native technologies, requiring manual configurations or the use of additional plugins.
Extensibility and Plugin Ecosystem: Jenkins X has a vast plugin ecosystem and offers extensibility through custom plugins and extensions, enabling users to tailor the CI/CD pipeline according to their specific needs. Hudson also supports plugins, but the Jenkins plugin ecosystem is much larger and more actively maintained, providing a wider range of available integrations and functionalities.
Community and Support: Jenkins X benefits from the active and thriving Jenkins community, which provides extensive documentation, user forums, and continuous development of new features and improvements. Hudson, while still maintained, has a relatively smaller community and may have limited support or resources compared to Jenkins X.

In summary, Jenkins X differentiates itself from Hudson by its microservices architecture, Kubernetes-native approach, support for GitOps workflows, emphasis on cloud-native technologies, extensibility through plugins, and strong community support.

🔥 Trending in Continuous Integration on StackShare

GitHub Actions Continuous Integration

Automate your workflow from idea to production

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

4.23k

3.11k

Advice on Hudson, Jenkins X

Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

Fast SBT builds (caching)
Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
Everything as code

Ease of use

181k views181k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hudson	Jenkins X
It monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently it focuses on the two jobs	Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes
Easy installation; Easy configuration; Change set support; Permanent links; RSS/E-mail/IM Integration; After-the-fact tagging; JUnit/TestNG test reporting; Distributed builds; File fingerprinting; Plugin Support	Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 800
Stacks 12	Stacks 147
Followers 18	Followers 370
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 7 Kubernetes integration 5 Scripted Pipelines 4 GitOps Cons 1 Complexity
Integrations
JavaScript Java HTML5	Kubernetes macOS Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian Fedora

What are some alternatives to Hudson, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.