StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. KrakenD vs jsonbox.io

KrakenD vs jsonbox.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9
jsonbox.io
jsonbox.io
Stacks2
Followers16
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.5K
Forks170

KrakenD vs jsonbox.io: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integration with APIs: KrakenD is specifically designed for integrating with multiple APIs, allowing users to aggregate data from different sources in a single request. On the other hand, jsonbox.io is a backend service that stores and collects JSON data via simple HTTP requests.

  2. Caching Mechanism: KrakenD offers a built-in caching mechanism that helps reduce latency by storing frequently accessed data. Jsonbox.io, on the other hand, does not have a built-in caching mechanism, which may result in slower response times for certain requests.

  3. Request Transformation: KrakenD allows users to transform requests easily by using a middleware layer, enabling functions like authentication, rate limiting, and response formatting. Jsonbox.io primarily focuses on data storage and retrieval, lacking such request transformation capabilities.

  4. Traffic Management: KrakenD provides various traffic management features such as rate limiting, request blocking, and IP whitelisting, empowering users to control and secure their API traffic effectively. Jsonbox.io, being a data storage service, lacks these traffic management functionalities.

  5. Extensibility: KrakenD offers a plugin system that allows users to extend the functionality of the API gateway by integrating custom middleware or services. Jsonbox.io is a more straightforward platform focused on storing and accessing JSON data without the extensibility options provided by KrakenD.

  6. Documentation Tools: While KrakenD provides comprehensive documentation tools to help users understand and utilize the API gateway efficiently, jsonbox.io has limited documentation resources, primarily focusing on basic usage guidelines.

In Summary, KrakenD is an API gateway focused on integrating APIs, caching data, transforming requests, managing traffic, offering extensibility through plugins, and providing in-depth documentation tools, while jsonbox.io is a simplicity-focused JSON data storage service lacking these advanced features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KrakenD
KrakenD
jsonbox.io
jsonbox.io

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

It is HTTP based JSON storage. It lets you store, read & modify JSON data over HTTP APIs for FREE. Ideal for small projects, prototypes or hackathons, where you don't have to spin up your own data store.

Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
HTTP based JSON storage; Store, read & modify JSON data
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
170
Stacks
59
Stacks
2
Followers
158
Followers
16
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easy to install
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
JSON
JSON

What are some alternatives to KrakenD, jsonbox.io?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope