Lens vs k3s

Overview

k3s

Stacks97

Followers252

Votes16

Lens

Stacks151

Followers183

Votes9

GitHub Stars23.0K

Forks1.5K

Lens vs k3s: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lens and k3s are two popular tools in the world of Kubernetes. While both tools serve the purpose of managing and monitoring Kubernetes clusters, there are some key differences between them.

Ease of use: Lens provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface that simplifies the management and monitoring of Kubernetes clusters. It offers a visually appealing dashboard with comprehensive cluster information and an easy-to-navigate UI. On the other hand, k3s aims to be lightweight and minimal, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. It prioritizes simplicity over advanced features, which might result in a less intuitive user experience compared to Lens.
Resource consumption: Lens consumes more system resources compared to k3s. Due to its feature-rich nature and UI-intensive dashboard, Lens requires a certain level of computational power and memory to run smoothly. On the contrary, k3s is designed to be lightweight and has a smaller footprint, making it more suitable for low-resource environments where minimizing resource consumption is essential.
Installation and setup: While Lens provides a user-friendly installation process through its official installer, k3s takes a different approach. K3s is designed to be easily installable and requires minimal effort to set up a Kubernetes cluster. It utilizes a single binary, making the installation process straightforward and hassle-free.
Integration with ecosystem: Lens offers seamless integration with various ecosystem tools and platforms. It provides built-in support for Helm, allowing users to easily manage and deploy Helm charts. Additionally, Lens offers integration with Prometheus and Grafana for advanced monitoring and visualization capabilities. On the other hand, k3s is more focused on providing a lightweight and minimal Kubernetes distribution, and the integration options may not be as extensive as those provided by Lens.
Community and support: Lens has a vibrant and active community, with frequent updates and new features being released regularly. It has a large user base, resulting in a wide range of community-driven resources and support channels. K3s also has a growing community, but it might not be as extensive as the Lens community. The level of support and availability of resources may vary between the two tools.
Security and updates: Lens places a strong emphasis on security and offers features such as role-based access control (RBAC) and multi-factor authentication (MFA). It also provides regular updates and security patches to address any potential vulnerabilities. K3s also prioritizes security but may have a different update and release cycle compared to Lens.

In summary, Lens and k3s differ in terms of ease of use, resource consumption, installation and setup process, integration with ecosystem tools, community and support, and security and updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

k3s	Lens
Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.	It is the only IDE you’ll ever need to take control of your Kubernetes clusters. It is a standalone application for MacOS, Windows and Linux operating systems. It is open source and free.
ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support	Multi Cluster Management; Multiple Workspaces; Built-In Prometheus Stats; Built-in Helm Applications Management; Context Aware Terminal;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 23.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 97	Stacks 151
Followers 252	Followers 183
Votes 16	Votes 9
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Lightweight 4 Easy 2 Replication Controller 2 Scale Services 2 Open Source	Pros 4 Keep track of cluster changes 2 Easy management of multiple clusters 2 Open Source 1 Local installation, not SaaS
Integrations
Kubernetes SQLite	Kubernetes Linux macOS Windows

What are some alternatives to k3s, Lens?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Lens vs k3s: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lens and k3s are two popular tools in the world of Kubernetes. While both tools serve the purpose of managing and monitoring Kubernetes clusters, there are some key differences between them.

Ease of use: Lens provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface that simplifies the management and monitoring of Kubernetes clusters. It offers a visually appealing dashboard with comprehensive cluster information and an easy-to-navigate UI. On the other hand, k3s aims to be lightweight and minimal, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. It prioritizes simplicity over advanced features, which might result in a less intuitive user experience compared to Lens.
Resource consumption: Lens consumes more system resources compared to k3s. Due to its feature-rich nature and UI-intensive dashboard, Lens requires a certain level of computational power and memory to run smoothly. On the contrary, k3s is designed to be lightweight and has a smaller footprint, making it more suitable for low-resource environments where minimizing resource consumption is essential.
Installation and setup: While Lens provides a user-friendly installation process through its official installer, k3s takes a different approach. K3s is designed to be easily installable and requires minimal effort to set up a Kubernetes cluster. It utilizes a single binary, making the installation process straightforward and hassle-free.
Integration with ecosystem: Lens offers seamless integration with various ecosystem tools and platforms. It provides built-in support for Helm, allowing users to easily manage and deploy Helm charts. Additionally, Lens offers integration with Prometheus and Grafana for advanced monitoring and visualization capabilities. On the other hand, k3s is more focused on providing a lightweight and minimal Kubernetes distribution, and the integration options may not be as extensive as those provided by Lens.
Community and support: Lens has a vibrant and active community, with frequent updates and new features being released regularly. It has a large user base, resulting in a wide range of community-driven resources and support channels. K3s also has a growing community, but it might not be as extensive as the Lens community. The level of support and availability of resources may vary between the two tools.
Security and updates: Lens places a strong emphasis on security and offers features such as role-based access control (RBAC) and multi-factor authentication (MFA). It also provides regular updates and security patches to address any potential vulnerabilities. K3s also prioritizes security but may have a different update and release cycle compared to Lens.

In summary, Lens and k3s differ in terms of ease of use, resource consumption, installation and setup process, integration with ecosystem tools, community and support, and security and updates.