StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Knapsack Pro vs Selenide

Knapsack Pro vs Selenide

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Knapsack Pro
Knapsack Pro
Stacks5
Followers4
Votes0

Knapsack Pro vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Knapsack Pro: Run 1 hour test suite in 2 minutes with optimal parallelisation on your CI. Split Ruby, JavaScript tests on parallel CI nodes to save time; Selenide: Concise UI tests in JAVA. It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Knapsack Pro can be classified as a tool in the "Testing Frameworks" category, while Selenide is grouped under "Browser Testing".

Some of the features offered by Knapsack Pro are:

  • Queue mode
  • Fallback mode
  • Auto split slow test file by test examples

On the other hand, Selenide provides the following key features:

  • Concise fluent API for tests
  • Ajax support for stable tests
  • Powerful selectors

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Selenide
Selenide
Knapsack Pro
Knapsack Pro

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Split Ruby, JavaScript tests on parallel CI nodes to save time.

Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Queue mode ; Fallback mode; Auto split slow test file by test examples
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
56
Stacks
5
Followers
85
Followers
4
Votes
16
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    File upload support
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
No community feedback yet
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jest
Jest
Ruby
Ruby
Cucumber
Cucumber
Cypress
Cypress
minitest
minitest
RSpec
RSpec
turnip
turnip

What are some alternatives to Selenide, Knapsack Pro?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana