Kobiton vs Selenide

Overview

Selenide

Stacks56

Followers85

Votes16

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Kobiton

Stacks25

Followers66

Votes0

Selenide vs Kobiton: What are the differences?

Developers describe Selenide as "Concise UI tests in JAVA". It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver. On the other hand, Kobiton is detailed as "A mobile cloud platform that enables users to perform manual or automated testing". It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual.

Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud..

Selenide belongs to "Testing Frameworks" category of the tech stack, while Kobiton can be primarily classified under "Browser Testing".

Some of the features offered by Selenide are:

Concise fluent API for tests
Ajax support for stable tests
Powerful selectors

On the other hand, Kobiton provides the following key features:

Automated or manual tests on real devices
Rich test logs
Public, Private or Hybrid cloud support

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenide, Kobiton

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenide	Kobiton
It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.	It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.
Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration	Automated or manual tests on real devices; Rich test logs; Public, Private or Hybrid cloud support; Support for all major CI/CD tools and processes
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 56	Stacks 25
Followers 85	Followers 66
Votes 16	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Nice JAVA API 2 Integrated with WebDriverManager project 2 Very mature API 2 File upload support 2 Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework Cons 1 Hybrid page model not possible	Cons 1 Limited minutes
Integrations
BrowserStack Android Studio Selendroid Sauce Labs	CircleCI Travis CI Jenkins TeamCity

What are some alternatives to Selenide, Kobiton?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

Selenide belongs to "Testing Frameworks" category of the tech stack, while Kobiton can be primarily classified under "Browser Testing".

Some of the features offered by Selenide are:

Concise fluent API for tests
Ajax support for stable tests
Powerful selectors

On the other hand, Kobiton provides the following key features:

Automated or manual tests on real devices
Rich test logs
Public, Private or Hybrid cloud support

Kobiton vs Selenide